Jump to content





Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Realistically who will be there at pick 44?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
53 replies to this topic

#46 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,641
  • Reputation: 1,146
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 07:15 PM

so you can be a wr and run a 4.78 and get drafted in the first?


You can if you run routes and have hands like he does, and it was a 4.71 and 4.75 and the Drs. have even said his knee isn't 100% yet....

#47 micnificent28

micnificent28

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 23-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,240
  • Reputation: 484
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 07:17 PM

You can if you run routes and have hands like he does, and it was a 4.71 and 4.75 and the Drs. have even said his knee isn't 100% yet....

And you sir don't seem that is going to affect the stock of a guy who already wasn't the top rated guy? you would still take him at 14?

#48 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,641
  • Reputation: 1,146
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 07:19 PM

And you sir don't seem that is going to affect the stock of a guy who already wasn't the top rated guy? you would still take him at 14?


If our team Drs said the knee wasn't going to be a lingering injury he would be one of the prospects in play yes. I can't definitively say I would take him without knowing who was still on the board. I would obviously look to trade down first, but if I couldn't yea Keenan would be one of the guys I would be choosing between....

#49 jarhead

jarhead

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,648
  • Reputation: 999
HUDDLER

Posted 10 April 2013 - 07:52 AM

There may be some really good talent in the 2nd at NT and OG. I am not convinced that there is elite talent at WR....maybe really good talent but not elite I think.At NT I think either Jenkins,Hankins ,or J Williams should be there and all can be that 2 down run stuffers. At OG I like Warford just about as much as Warmack and Cooper. At CB if Jonathan banks falls I think he would be a strong consideration.

#50 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • Joined: 12-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,050
  • Reputation: 139
HUDDLER

Posted 10 April 2013 - 08:12 AM

we should def get a nice player in the 2nd that i expect to contribute right away

#51 prowler2k8

prowler2k8

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 573
  • Reputation: 22
HUDDLER

Posted 10 April 2013 - 02:53 PM

http://www.seahawks.com/news/draft/2012/index.html

Not sure if I understand your reply. I was replying to your post about the Seahawks taking Kawan Short with their 1st round pick in the upcomimg draft, which they traded to Minnesota for Percy Harvin.

#52 OneBadCat

OneBadCat

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-February 13
  • posts: 1,760
  • Reputation: 787
SUPPORTER

Posted 10 April 2013 - 03:00 PM

The Jarrett comparisons are off base. Dwayne was an idiot that didn't apply himself. He didn't fail because he wasn't fast.

#53 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,793
  • Reputation: 7,962
Moderators

Posted 10 April 2013 - 03:06 PM

The Jarrett comparisons are off base. Dwayne was an idiot that didn't apply himself. He didn't fail because he wasn't fast.

yep. came in entitled. wanted to do his thing his way. didn't take to coaching. didn't want to take on other roles. didn't want to put in extra work.

#54 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,641
  • Reputation: 1,146
HUDDLER

Posted 10 April 2013 - 03:31 PM

The Jarrett comparisons are off base. Dwayne was an idiot that didn't apply himself. He didn't fail because he wasn't fast.


Yep I was a huge DJ fan and still think he could have done just fine if he wanted to.....