Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Keenan Allen Pro Day Tommorow.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
327 replies to this topic

#217 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:41 PM

Oh I totally agree. Nobody knows what this team will do in the draft. But that won't stop the MB GM's around here who will say they do.


KKL, who will the panthers take in two weeks?

#218 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 13
  • posts: 8,712
  • Reputation: 3,600
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:47 PM

You're acting as he's 100% healthy and ran that. You also dismiss his other skills and assets that aren't his speed. Like his route running, his ability to play the outside and the slot. His punt returning ability. Size, build, strength, hands. But oh no, he ran a 4.71 forty, he's not worth it now. LOL. Man...


Allen said himself his knee was at 100%. No excuses. Fans like yourself blamed the QB at Cal for Keenan not being able to get enough separation between him and DBs but his speed has always been average at best. Who cares if he played at slot and on the outside? Both Hopkins and Bailey did that too.

Dismiss what? I recommend you re-read my statement. I didn't criticize his hands and routes, now did I? I made a point that you didn't bother to address. What makes Allen better than Hopkins? It ain't his hands, it isn't his routes, and it certainly isn't his speed and size.

So you tell me, how is he superior to a WR like Hopkins?

#219 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,681
  • Reputation: 1,157
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:48 PM

Allen said himself his knee was at 100%. No excuses. Fans like yourself blamed the QB at Cal for Keenan not being able to get enough separation between him and DBs but his speed has always been average at best. Who cares if he played at slot and on the outside? Both Hopkins and Bailey did that too.

Dismiss what? I recommend you re-read my statement. I didn't criticize his hands and routes, now did I? I made a point that you didn't bother to address. What makes Allen better than Hopkins? It ain't his hands, it isn't his routes, and it certainly isn't his speed and size.

So you tell me, how is he superior to a WR like Hopkins?


Way to leave out the fact that Dr. James Andrews said the muscle is about 75% so he's lacking explosive ability. Eh whatever proves your point I guess.....

#220 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:50 PM

KKL, who will the panthers take in two weeks?



1. New GM + HC fighting for his Job + Owner looking for stadium money + New OC + Fa signing =
I don't have a fuging clue.

#221 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 13
  • posts: 8,712
  • Reputation: 3,600
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:55 PM

Way to leave out the fact that Dr. James Andrews said the muscle is about 75% so he's lacking explosive ability. Eh whatever proves your point I guess.....


85%.

Even if Allen were completely at 100%, I doubt he'd run a 4.4. Keenan has average speed. I saw him running a 4.55 or a 4.62, if healthy.

#222 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,128
  • Reputation: 2,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:02 PM

Allen said himself his knee was at 100%. No excuses. Fans like yourself blamed the QB at Cal for Keenan not being able to get enough separation between him and DBs but his speed has always been average at best. Who cares if he played at slot and on the outside? Both Hopkins and Bailey did that too.

Dismiss what? I recommend you re-read my statement. I didn't criticize his hands and routes, now did I? I made a point that you didn't bother to address. What makes Allen better than Hopkins? It ain't his hands, it isn't his routes, and it certainly isn't his speed and size.

So you tell me, how is he superior to a WR like Hopkins?



So its not an excuse because he said it and it was true. I'm not even mentioning what his doctor said which by the way, he's a doctor... I advise you re-read my statements and tell me when I mentioned Hopkins or even said that I don't want Hopkins... You're arguing with yourself. Fans like you are quick to dismiss key pieces of information just to be "right".

Just so you don't spew crap and try to put things in my mouth. I want Allen, Hopkins, Hunter. Either one of them is fine with me.

Also saying that Hopkins is better only because Most people say Allen had a crap QB is asenine. Allen had Clausen 2.0 throwing him the ball. Guess what? He produced with that crap QB play. Making him more skillful.

#223 SIGCHI222

SIGCHI222

    the illustrious potentate

  • Joined: 15-February 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,279
  • Reputation: 4,167
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:03 PM

85%.

Even if Allen were completely at 100%, I doubt he'd run a 4.4. Keenan has average speed. I saw him running a 4.55 or a 4.62, if healthy.


4.71 times .85 equals 4.0035. Again, not sure if any of us are using any type of logic that Aristotle or Plato would agree with.

#224 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,655
  • Reputation: 1,181
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:06 PM

Everybody on NFLN dismissed the 40 time as he has only been cleared to workout for a few weeks and never thought he was going to kill it in the 40 anyway.

His route running and hands( Hopkins drops a lot of balls) are in fact superior to Hopkins for those asking. Just go to YouTube type in the prospects name and add "vs".,, plenty of game cut ups will arise and allow you to see for yourself.

I did notice Hopkins getting deep more often but this also seems to be a byproduct of his qb and offensive line providing the time for such routes. Defendes also tended to spy on Allen with multiple players and he still got separation with suddenness in his routes.

Allen also had enough speed to be trusted as a returner and proved explosive enough as evidenced by Cal's willingness to to hand him the ball in the backfield.

If you are dying for a straight line speedster Hopkins and Allen are the wrong guys to consider. I'd recommend Austin and Patterson for this.

I'd prefer Patterson of the 2 speedsters as I like his physical tools that accompany the speed. Yes he's not as polished as Austin but I just think he's not the right fit for our offense. I don't see him getting up for jump balls anywhere on YouTube, his combine vertical sucked and his bench reps concern me in terms of beating the jam.

Allen seems to be the most balanced receiver of the group and has the lowest floor IMO assuming he can heal properly and in time. If you want highest ceiling then that belongs to Patterson.

#225 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,652
  • Reputation: 2,299
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:06 PM

For what it's worth, Jerry Rice ran a 4.71.
Everybody has an opinion but you guys that are dogmatically stating that your opinion is the only possible correct conclusion are making me laugh.
Once again I bring up Luke Kuechly, who like a total of 4 of us wanted last year during these discussions.


We should all just cool our jets.


Well I was one of those who championed Newton in 2011 and Kuechly in 2012, and I clearly don't see Allen anywhere close to either of those 2. In fact the lack of exceptional talent in the first and the depth of the draft have made me somewhat ambivalent about who to champion this year. But anyone who thinks a receiver who is not heads and shoulders above the others when 100% is worth a top 15 pick when he can't even run all the drills and admits he is only 75% after 5 months of rehab is thinking with his heart and not his head.

And using Jerry Rice's 4.71 to justify drafting an injured receiver is like saying that we should only draft quarterbacks in the 6th round because that is where Tom Brady was drafted.

#226 SIGCHI222

SIGCHI222

    the illustrious potentate

  • Joined: 15-February 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,279
  • Reputation: 4,167
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:23 PM

Well I was one of those who championed Newton in 2011 and Kuechly in 2012, and I clearly don't see Allen anywhere close to either of those 2. In fact the lack of exceptional talent in the first and the depth of the draft have made me somewhat ambivalent about who to champion this year. But anyone who thinks a receiver who is not heads and shoulders above the others when 100% is worth a top 15 pick when he can't even run all the drills and admits he is only 75% after 5 months of rehab is thinking with his heart and not his head.

And using Jerry Rice's 4.71 to justify drafting an injured receiver is like saying that we should only draft quarterbacks in the 6th round because that is where Tom Brady was drafted.


Ahh, let's use past anomalies to predict the future. Where was Micheal Jordan drafted?
The Bobcats should trade to that position (regardless of cost) every year, correct?

#227 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,128
  • Reputation: 2,848
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:31 PM

Well I was one of those who championed Newton in 2011 and Kuechly in 2012, and I clearly don't see Allen anywhere close to either of those 2. In fact the lack of exceptional talent in the first and the depth of the draft have made me somewhat ambivalent about who to champion this year. But anyone who thinks a receiver who is not heads and shoulders above the others when 100% is worth a top 15 pick when he can't even run all the drills and admits he is only 75% after 5 months of rehab is thinking with his heart and not his head.

And using Jerry Rice's 4.71 to justify drafting an injured receiver is like saying that we should only draft quarterbacks in the 6th round because that is where Tom Brady was drafted.



So we should get Austin then, because he's clearly the #1 guy right? Oh wait no we shouldn't, because he's smitty 2.0..

You're clearly twisting data given. Allen and Rice (pre hall if fame) are and were similar. Same 40 time, height, build, hands. Polished route runner. Etc etc.

He did say for what its worth. Take it with a grain of salt. The similarities are there.


#228 Monday Night Shyamalan

Monday Night Shyamalan

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 04-September 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 510
  • Reputation: 260
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:52 PM

I think Hopkins is the most complete....his ceiling just isn't the highest


Hopkins is a close second for me, I see your point though. A college players ceiling is a variable I hold in high regard, I don't believe most athletes fully develop until their mid-20's (primarily in regards to mental aspects of the game. I would still rather have Hopkins over Patterson, Hunter, Austin, etc.