Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers expected to select DT within first 3 rounds per Tony Pauline


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#41 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,501
  • Reputation: 3,467
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:31 PM

QB in the first and RB in the second in my opinion

#42 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,501
  • Reputation: 3,467
SUPPORTER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:33 PM

http://www.rotoworld...ith-trades?pg=2

This Mock has us trading down in the first round...

#43 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:43 PM

It'd be a meltdown because a lot of the "experts" have convinced everyone that the Panthers are leaning heavily and early at taking a DT... There isn't one listed in my previous post at all...


So in your mind we have a great DT situation?

Doesn't take a expert to look at our roster and say "dam they need DT's and have needed them for years".

#44 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,212
  • Reputation: 1,482
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:19 PM

So in your mind we have a great DT situation?

Doesn't take a expert to look at our roster and say "dam they need DT's and have needed them for years".


Are you that dense? It was more of a "the Panthers will do the opposite of what everyone is saying LOL" sarcasm post and not an in-depth opinion piece...

No wonder I gave up posting for the most part in the Panthers forums...

#45 Woodie

Woodie

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,214
  • Reputation: 143
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:22 PM

LOL, sounds like Tony is really on top of our draft situation.

The thing I find funny is that many fans here who have no actual contacts and mostly speak based on 4th, 5th and 6th hand information, mock someone who does have real contacts and actually talks to people within the league and team insiders. Nobody knows what will happen, but to dismiss what someone that may have actual information says because it's not what you want is just silly to me. Personally, I simply take it all in, whether I like it or not, and add it to my knowledge base.

By the way, I'm not talking specifically to you Catman, I'm just using your post as a platform to make a point.

#46 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:28 PM

Are you that dense? It was more of a "the Panthers will do the opposite of what everyone is saying LOL" sarcasm post and not an in-depth opinion piece...

No wonder I gave up posting for the most part in the Panthers forums...


There is no sarcastic word in your post. You have been on the Wr in the 1st bandwagon all offseason. Don't switch up now.

#47 The Golden Child

The Golden Child

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,848
  • Reputation: 363
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 04:47 PM

Datone Jones is an interesting option at DT. He's a bit of a tweener but so was Quentin Coples last year. If you recall we were probably going to draft Coples and play him at DT if Luke hadn't fallen to us.

#48 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
  • LocationGreenville, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:05 PM

I think the fact that we haven't signed another DT besides Dwan, and that we did bring in some defensive back depth (no quality starters) that we will go DT at 14. It would have to take someone to fall for us not to take DT. Although I do like the idea of Nuke Hopkins if possible, but 14 will be too high for him. Xavier Rhodes seems like it could be a bit high, but i'd take it. I just hope he can cut it as a pro.

#49 Bronn

Bronn

    Sellsword

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,212
  • Reputation: 1,482
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 06:46 PM

There is no sarcastic word in your post. You have been on the Wr in the 1st bandwagon all offseason. Don't switch up now.


Wtf are you talking about? Read my posts. I want Austin.

#50 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,424
  • Reputation: 2,154
  • LocationAt the lake
HUDDLER

Posted 09 April 2013 - 08:17 PM

We wont be taking Allen in the first. We felt Newton was such a high reward guy 2 years we had to take him. Last year Kueckly was rated by many the best defensive player in the draft. Honestly Allen isn't even the best receiver on many guys boards. And he won't be the BPA at 14 given all the injury issues. If we had 2 first round picks and perhaps 10 picks overall you can take a flier on a guy who might turn into a great player. But when you have no 3rd and only 5 picks total, you go for guys who are safe and likely not to bust or need extensive development.
You just can't say that about Allen. He is still months from being 100% and even longer from being ready to play in the NFL. A team like the 49ers might have the picks to use one on him. We just don't. Too risky at this point. Sad but true. He has had ankle and knee injuries this year. As much talent as he might have, he is just not a good fit for us given our limited picks and need for immediately impactful players. This will be Gettleman's first draft and his initial first round pick. He will be looking to hit a homerun. Who picks an injured player with so many healthy options on the table at 14??? Lets be real here........................


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users