Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

Blood on the hands of pro-abortionists... "deal with it"

Recommended Posts

 Today's episode of Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman highlighted the budding technology concerning human reproduction.  Part of the episode showed a man who had successfully gestated and "birthed" dozens of sharks completely outside of the womb of the mother. According to him the only necessary thing left for him to do this with a human baby is permission, and a deeper understanding of the conditions inside the womb throughout the gestation so that he can properly replicate it safely.

 

"Viability outside of the Womb" is not a valid argument. The entire process can happen without the mother.

 

oh ffs.

 

We can't do that with humans, we don't have the technology.  Sharks and humans are quite different (ectotherms have a different gestation process and don't have the same kind of temperature regulations that endotherms do).  Until such point as that scientist actually can do that with a mammal (like a mouse) he would NEVER receive funding to try it on a human.

 

You can't legislate today based on what technology tomorrow might bring tomorrow save for when you are trying to fund research directly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


oh ffs.

 

We can't do that with humans, we don't have the technology.  Sharks and humans are quite different (ectotherms have a different gestation process and don't have the same kind of temperature regulations that endotherms do).  Until such point as that scientist actually can do that with a mammal (like a mouse) he would NEVER receive funding to try it on a human.

 

You can't legislate today based on what technology tomorrow might bring tomorrow save for when you are trying to fund research directly.

I have to admit I am surprised, but am thoroughly enjoying your reaction.  Being a scientist, or a scientist in training (no disrespect i just remember you are still going through school) you know that this is proof of concept which is more than enough to satisfy the original argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit I am surprised, but am thoroughly enjoying your reaction.  Being a scientist, or a scientist in training (no disrespect i just remember you are still going through school) you know that this is proof of concept which is more than enough to satisfy the original argument.

 

A scientist with a theory is most definitely not enough to invalidate abortion today.  Your original argument was that humans could basically develop outside the womb earlier than they could.  I showed that you were wrong, and you still ARE wrong.  In a couple years, you may be right.  I have no idea what future technology will bring, but considering what we are capable of, this decade will likely see artificial wombs for mammals.  But that doesn't mean we will see them for humans in that same time frame.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosnell simply provided a service that many pro-aborts support and encourage.  Find one instance where any prolifer in this thread has supported or encouraged the work that Eric Rudolph did. 

test

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,300
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Huddle Racism Watchdog
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      140,488
    • Total Posts
      4,472,828
×