Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Full 32 team mock


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1 toldozer

toldozer

    finally someone fatter than Alice

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,634
  • Reputation: 1,466
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 06:51 PM

Im doing a mock as the panthers, i have already traded down from 14 to 21

For picks 84 & 156

Also gave pick 184.

Should i stay put or try and trade down again

Its at pick 18 now

Cyprien, slyvester williams, richardson, hopkins, austin, allen, hunter are all still on the board atm. Which would take or do you have a better suggestion?

#2 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,445
  • Reputation: 1,075
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 06:55 PM

I would take Cyprien or Allen....

#3 toldozer

toldozer

    finally someone fatter than Alice

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,634
  • Reputation: 1,466
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 06:58 PM

I wouldnt mind trying to slide 5 or 6 spots and pick up another 4th to nab lattimore though.

#4 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,060
  • Reputation: 1,991
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 07:01 PM

would not hurt to drop back about 5 more

#5 firstdayfan

firstdayfan

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 07-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,688
  • Reputation: 188
  • LocationColumbia, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 08:59 PM

Gotta take Austin if he's still on the board doubt he will be so go with Cyprien. Fills a huge need and there will be several good options in the second.

#6 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,445
  • Reputation: 1,075
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 09:34 PM

I don't get why you HAVE to take Austin. Sure he's a weapon, but is he a can't miss definite number one Wide Receiver? I have my doubts on that. I see Austin as more of a luxury pick because he doesn't have a true position, just a chess piece you can move around. Just my two pennies....

#7 firstdayfan

firstdayfan

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 07-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,688
  • Reputation: 188
  • LocationColumbia, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 09:46 PM

I just think he has really good value at 21...can't really pass up explosive, game changing players. There were people who didn't want Cam, but you can't pass up that kind of unique talent. In Austin's case there isn't another offensive player like him in the draft. I feel like thats well worth the 21st pick...or the 14th for that matter. I like Cyprien, Allen, and Williams but Austin is a dynamic player that could take our offense to a whole new level.

#8 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,445
  • Reputation: 1,075
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 10:01 PM

I just think he has really good value at 21...can't really pass up explosive, game changing players. There were people who didn't want Cam, but you can't pass up that kind of unique talent. In Austin's case there isn't another offensive player like him in the draft. I feel like thats well worth the 21st pick...or the 14th for that matter. I like Cyprien, Allen, and Williams but Austin is a dynamic player that could take our offense to a whole new level.


I would argue there's several that could be used in very similar ways....

#9 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 10:11 PM

I don't get why you HAVE to take Austin. Sure he's a weapon, but is he a can't miss definite number one Wide Receiver? I have my doubts on that. I see Austin as more of a luxury pick because he doesn't have a true position, just a chess piece you can move around. Just my two pennies....


But he's more a Harvin chess piece, not McCluster.

#10 C47

C47

    89...Panther for Life...

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,445
  • Reputation: 1,075
HUDDLER

Posted 15 April 2013 - 10:30 PM

But he's more a Harvin chess piece, not McCluster.


I agree, but if we're taking a wide receiver in the first I want it to be a guy who can be a number one. Don't get me wrong, I love Austin and if we had a young number one already established I would be all over bringing him in as a toy for Shula to move around. I just don't think he's the best available "WR", and I think you can get similar toys later in the draft. A guy I've seen mentioned on here a few times and I really like a lot is Onterio McCalebb


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users