Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

panthers55

Person suggests that nickel and safety might already be covered

Recommended Posts

Well the defense got better towards the end, and now is a different era, we play Atlanta that is effective at throwing the ball and they can score just as much as us if we don't get pressure on mattie. Now that they have Stephen Jackson you can't take them lightly. Playing the Saints is a toss up. And if you can't remember last year, forte was running like he had a school bus opening the hole, and the game against the giants was just embarrassing. The past 2 years the offense has been pretty decent ranking in the top 10 but the defense needs to be top 10 all year.if we did add on offense I think it should be to strengthen the line.

It's a different era now. It's a passing league and we already have a mid level defense that will probably be even better then last year. You win. Throwing the ball. Add weapons for cam and this team wins more games then adding a fat ass for the d line

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


No fuging way. What if that WR or TE doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a TE or WR in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure Eifert would be the next Gronk or Austin the next Smitty it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the defense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible D last year is proof. We all hit the panic button when Gamble went to IR and when gimpy Beason wasted 4 games where Kuechly could have been dominating in the middle.

You add another solid player to the defense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough offense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good defense your offense doesn't have to light up the scoreboard.

yeah, but....What if that defensive player doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a DT or S in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure richardson would be the next sapp or vacarro the next ed reed it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the offense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible O, cam's rookie year and the end of last year is proof.

You add another solid player to the offense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough defense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good offense your defense doesn't have to shut down the scoreboard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Person is a dumb fug if I've ever seen one. He says we don't need a db or safety or a WR and aren't high on many of the dts well we have to draft somebody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, but....What if that defensive player doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a DT or S in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure richardson would be the next sapp or vacarro the next ed reed it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the offense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible O, cam's rookie year and the end of last year is proof.

You add another solid player to the offense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough defense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good offense your defense doesn't have to shut down the scoreboard.

You are literally my favorite person on this forum I swear lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



×