Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Person suggests that nickel and safety might already be covered


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#61 ThunderKatt

ThunderKatt

    Hello to All my Haters

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,029 posts
  • LocationIn yo moma

Posted 22 April 2013 - 08:56 AM

Well the defense got better towards the end, and now is a different era, we play Atlanta that is effective at throwing the ball and they can score just as much as us if we don't get pressure on mattie. Now that they have Stephen Jackson you can't take them lightly. Playing the Saints is a toss up. And if you can't remember last year, forte was running like he had a school bus opening the hole, and the game against the giants was just embarrassing. The past 2 years the offense has been pretty decent ranking in the top 10 but the defense needs to be top 10 all year.if we did add on offense I think it should be to strengthen the line.

It's a different era now. It's a passing league and we already have a mid level defense that will probably be even better then last year. You win. Throwing the ball. Add weapons for cam and this team wins more games then adding a fat ass for the d line



#62 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,724 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 22 April 2013 - 01:42 PM

Tell me why we can't get a DT and weapons for Cam? Doesn't have to be either or...

#63 GoCarolina8990

GoCarolina8990

    All Day

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,737 posts

Posted 22 April 2013 - 02:19 PM

Give me an elite offense over elite defense any day. Wr/te in the first two would make us deadly


No fuging way. What if that WR or TE doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a TE or WR in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure Eifert would be the next Gronk or Austin the next Smitty it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the defense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible D last year is proof. We all hit the panic button when Gamble went to IR and when gimpy Beason wasted 4 games where Kuechly could have been dominating in the middle.

You add another solid player to the defense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough offense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good defense your offense doesn't have to light up the scoreboard.

#64 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,424 posts

Posted 22 April 2013 - 03:25 PM

No fuging way. What if that WR or TE doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a TE or WR in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure Eifert would be the next Gronk or Austin the next Smitty it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the defense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible D last year is proof. We all hit the panic button when Gamble went to IR and when gimpy Beason wasted 4 games where Kuechly could have been dominating in the middle.

You add another solid player to the defense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough offense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good defense your offense doesn't have to light up the scoreboard.

yeah, but....What if that defensive player doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a DT or S in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure richardson would be the next sapp or vacarro the next ed reed it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the offense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible O, cam's rookie year and the end of last year is proof.

You add another solid player to the offense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough defense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good offense your defense doesn't have to shut down the scoreboard.

#65 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,294 posts
  • LocationGreenville, SC

Posted 22 April 2013 - 06:33 PM

Thats what I been saying.


Don't forget who our OC is and the fact our OL is swiss cheese.

#66 AceBoogie

AceBoogie

    LiveStrong

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,802 posts

Posted 22 April 2013 - 06:40 PM

Person is a dumb fug if I've ever seen one. He says we don't need a db or safety or a WR and aren't high on many of the dts well we have to draft somebody.

#67 CarolinaCoolin

CarolinaCoolin

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,469 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 23 April 2013 - 05:37 PM

yeah, but....What if that defensive player doesn't plan out as intended, drafting a DT or S in round 1 is not guaranteeing you get a stud back. If we knew for sure richardson would be the next sapp or vacarro the next ed reed it would make the pick a lot easier.

As far as the offense though, it is true we are very close to having an incredible O, cam's rookie year and the end of last year is proof.

You add another solid player to the offense in the first round, who knows how good they can be...

If we cant generate enough defense to win with what we have now (and what is inevitably going to get better by week 1) there is a problem because with a good offense your defense doesn't have to shut down the scoreboard.


You are literally my favorite person on this forum I swear lol


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com