Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Kevin Greene

The Day 2 Safety/Wide Receiver Market

33 posts in this topic

Admittedly I'd like us to be as fortunate as we were Day 1 and address these 2 positions of need. To fill both positions of course would necessitate some sort of trade.

Let's look at what's available at pick 44, just 12 picks in tomorrow. Thanks Cleveland (supplemental) and New Orleans (Cheaters forfeit).

Safety:

Jonathan Cyprien

D.J. Swearinger

Phillip Thomas

Shamarko Thomas

Bacarri Rambo

Wide Receiver

Keenan Allen

Justin Hunter

Robert Woods

Quinton Patton

Terrance Williams

Stedman Bailey

Still some quality Oline and Corner Back talent on the board as well we could use.

Personaly I'd like to see Hunter or Cyprien at 44.

Who ya got?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cyprien, Hunter, and Swearinger would be my top 3 choices. I wouldn't be upset with Bailey either. The guy just make plays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cyprien, hunter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cyprien, Rambo, Hunter, or Allen. Don't ever care that we don't have a third. Weren't supposed to have Star. (Aside from maybe Rambo) not supposed to have Hunter, Cyprien, or Allen. I know we have to wait and see what happens but how can you not be excited for the potential of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want an athletic S that can cover a TE and still bring the wood.

Swearinger doesnt do it for me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shamarko Thomas/ Allen

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cyprien, Rambo, Hunter, or Allen. Don't ever care that we don't have a third. Weren't supposed to have Star

Exactly. If we would've had a 3rd, I would've been willing to package it with #14 and go up and get Star anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.