Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Do we have to go offense this second pick?


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,434
  • Reputation: 993
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:13 PM

We addressed one of our biggest needs while following the BPA philosophy, our d-line is pretty much shored up. As bad as our offense was last year, does this second pick need to go into helping cam and others?

#2 Salvo

Salvo

    BEWB

  • Joined: 19-August 10
  • posts: 956
  • Reputation: 772
  • LocationColorado
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:18 PM

Don't have to. Still have some glaring holes in the secondary. Hoping Cyprien will be there. Otherwise, get Warford and plug up that RG spot.

#3 2jakefansinva

2jakefansinva

    Coach Jack Bolton

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,983
  • Reputation: 768
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:20 PM

Don't have to. Still have some glaring holes in the secondary. Hoping Cyprien will be there. Otherwise, get Warford and plug up that RG spot.


solid!

#4 The Golden Child

The Golden Child

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,848
  • Reputation: 363
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:21 PM

TE Ertz could be a surprise pick. We were targeting a TE in the 1st, maybe Gettleman is still targeting a TE in the 2nd.

#5 Keep Pounding

Keep Pounding

    Smith & Wesson 460

  • Joined: 22-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,802
  • Reputation: 580
  • LocationIn your backyard!!!!
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:26 PM

Justin Hunter would be my ideal pick with our 2nd round selection....

#6 44johnson

44johnson

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 15-May 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 564
  • Reputation: 85
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:57 PM

TE Ertz could be a surprise pick. We were targeting a TE in the 1st, maybe Gettleman is still targeting a TE in the 2nd.


I am not saying he is better than Eiffert but for the Panthers I personally preferred Ertz. He would help in the passing game and would tremendously upgrade the running game.

#7 XClown1986

XClown1986

    I'm a good clown

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 2,090
  • Reputation: 571
SUPPORTER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 01:00 PM

I am not saying he is better than Eiffert but for the Panthers I personally preferred Ertz. He would help in the passing game and would tremendously upgrade the running game.


Eifert is a much better blocker than Ertz.

Ertz offers nothing as a blocker at this point, he is merely a big receiver.

#8 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,338
  • Reputation: 827
  • LocationButtsville, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 01:11 PM

Steve Smith is 33 an I'd like to see us take a WR before the 4th but

if S/CB is the BPA I won't mind

#9 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,818
  • Reputation: 4,796
HUDDLER

Posted 26 April 2013 - 01:14 PM

Our current offensive roster is better than the 2011 offensive roster which was excellent. Our woes last year was playcalling, not talent. I hope we focus almost exclusively on defense in this draft, with maybe some o-line depth in the 4th.

#10 Guest_shitposting_*

Guest_shitposting_*
Guests

Posted 26 April 2013 - 01:15 PM

I'd be happy with a WR or TE, but having a solid S would really solidify our defense.

I'm worried about Smith as well, but I'm hoping the offseason signings will light some fires and create competition within our current roster.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users