Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Blowing money just not for Dems


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#11 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • Joined: 16-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,950
  • Reputation: 607
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:32 AM

Straight ticket helps maintain dynasties and a false sense of security.


I feel like dynasties get a big boost from name recognition, which if anything would be worse without straight ticket because those people that would vote straight ticket will be forced to look at the names

#12 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,958
MFCEO

Posted 29 April 2013 - 12:51 PM

This is why government spending will never be decreased in any meaningful way. Millions of jobs tied to military spending.



Question: Couldn't we easily keep those jobs going but just switch them to making something we do need like solar panels?

#13 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • posts: 9,002
  • Reputation: 1,386
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:18 PM

Question: Couldn't we easily keep those jobs going but just switch them to making something we do need like nuclear facilities?



FIFY

#14 Niner National

Niner National

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,581
  • Reputation: 493
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:18 PM

Question: Couldn't we easily keep those jobs going but just switch them to making something we do need like solar panels?

Could, but then you'd just have people bitching about more subsidies to a liberal pet project.

Excessive military spending is, of course, not subsidizing any industries and creating false demand. If the liberals would just shut up we'd have a tank in every drive way and a drone in every garage.

#15 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • Joined: 16-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,950
  • Reputation: 607
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:38 PM

Question: Couldn't we easily keep those jobs going but just switch them to making something we do need like solar panels?


If only we let the military spend the money as they see fit...

http://www.businessw...ually-Renewable

U.S. Military to Invest $10 Billion Annually in Renewable Energy by 2030, According to Pike Research


BOULDER, Colo --In September the U.S. Army announced that it has formed a new Energy Initiatives Task Force that will assess renewable energy projects, vet potential suppliers, and develop new technologies to support the Army’s growing commitment to powering its bases and its missions with renewable energy. The Task Force is part of a Pentagon-wide effort to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels and embrace renewable energy sources as the military confronts the issues of energy costs, energy security for remote bases and operations, and the effects of energy on strategic goals. According to a recent report from Pike Research, annual spending on renewable energy by the Department of Defense (DOD) will reach $10 billion by 2030. While a significant portion of this will be spent on Facilities operations, including permanent bases, the majority of the spending will be for Mobility applications including portable soldier power as well as land, air, and sea vehicles.


“The DOD is positioned to become the single most important driver of the cleantech revolution in the United States,” says Pike Research president Clint Wheelock. “In particular, military investment in renewable energy and related technologies can help bridge the ‘valley of death’ that lies between research & development and full commercialization of these technologies.”

Pike Research estimates that the DOD currently spends approximately $20 billion per year on energy – 75% for fuel and 25% for facilities and infrastructure. Among the key sectors that will receive significant Pentagon attention and investment over the next two decades are solar power for both permanent bases and temporary facilities; fuel cells for individual soldier power; microgrids for military facilities; and biofuels for military vehicles, particularly the Navy’s “Great Green Fleet” initiative to shift to a largely biofuels-driven fleet by 2016. The total market for renewable energy for mobile power for forward bases and temporary installations, for instance, is forecast to reach $6.1 billion by 2030.

By way of comparison, the total annual expenditure by China on renewable energy for military applications will reach $4.5 billion in 2030.



#16 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,920
  • Reputation: 5,441
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 01:58 PM

Both parties suck.....and waste billions.

this is why I actually supported the forced cuts.....it has to happen. And, the policiticans are not going to do it themselves.

#17 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,415
  • Reputation: 2,347
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 04:04 PM

So is it Obamas fault, or kudos to the Republican Congress, that this happened?

I'm confused because my conservative friends just seem to be posting "Blame Obama!" stuff about it lately instead of "Thanks Obama" stuff.

#18 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • Joined: 06-August 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,529
  • Reputation: 1,266
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:11 PM

Keeping the Abrams production line rolling protects businesses and good paying jobs in congressional districts where the tank's many suppliers are located.


whoa wait a minute i thought government spending can't create jobs wtf


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users