Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Anyone catch Smitty this afternoon?


  • Please log in to reply
138 replies to this topic

#11 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,184
  • Reputation: 6,116
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:43 PM

smith is wrong, playmakers does not necessarily mean just on offense

#12 OneBadCat

OneBadCat

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 19-February 13
  • posts: 1,681
  • Reputation: 765
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:43 PM

What show is this on? Link me!!!!!!!!

#13 SgtJoo

SgtJoo

    Reppin that Bull City

  • Joined: 11-January 09
  • posts: 4,149
  • Reputation: 1,906
  • LocationDurham, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:44 PM

What show is this on? Link me!!!!!!!!


http://betaplayer.ra...he-fan-610-wfnz

#14 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:45 PM

and he better come out on fire next year

agreed. this starting out slow thing isn't anyway to prove we've got playmakers.

and if we do, then how is shula going to bring it out of them? what exactly is he going to do to maximize the talent and supposed playmaking ability of this team? by running an old school traditional ball control offense?

#15 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:46 PM

smith is wrong, playmakers does not necessarily mean just on offense

true. we lack them in the secondary and we have lacked it in special teams. hopefully with ginn and barner we've got those playmakers in special teams.

#16 carp24000

carp24000

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 17-January 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 495
  • Reputation: 353
  • LocationCharlotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:46 PM

*
A WHOLE PIE!

Some points:

- Rather have Mark Sanchez or half of Cam newton 10 times out of 10 over The Golden Calf of Bristol circus coming to Charlotte.
- Says the CB's a few years ago in New England were literally WR's and they had no business playing CB, yet the front 7 made the defense extremely good.
- Star and Short should be considered "Playmakers" even though they dont play "Sexy" positions.
- The armchair GM's need to chill out, because most dont know what they are talking about. Said it was a great draft for Carolina, and will no doubt help the defense improve.
-Leave the scouting to the professionals, and stop scouting from your computer desk.
-The media and "Experts" need to man up and admit they are wrong about picks.

Dont mess with Smitty's team...or he will make you pay. Tore Marc James apart for saying it was a bad draft.

#17 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:48 PM

Some points:

- Rather have Mark Sanchez or half of Cam newton 10 times out of 10 over The Golden Calf of Bristol circus coming to Charlotte.
- Says the CB's a few years ago in New England were literally WR's and they had no business playing CB, yet the front 7 made the defense extremely good.
- Star and Short should be considered "Playmakers" even though they dont play "Sexy" positions.
- The armchair GM's need to chill out, because most dont know what they are talking about. Said it was a great draft for Carolina, and will no doubt help the defense improve.


Will post more in a minute.

i don't disagree with the above.

i like the draft. i just wish we had picked up another receiver (either WR or TE) early and that we had another early pick to do it with.

#18 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,184
  • Reputation: 6,116
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:48 PM

in Smiths defense, theres nothing worse than having a 12 minute drive down the field to come out with a hard earned FG only to watch the defense give up a TD in less than 30 seconds.

#19 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:51 PM

in Smiths defense, theres nothing worse than having a 12 minute drive down the field to come out with a hard earned FG only to watch the defense give up a TD in less than 30 seconds.

and having your HC hand out an invitation to score rather than keep the ball in your offenses hands.

the defense should never have been put in that situation to begin with. you don't give the other team the ball with time left on the clock and only being up by one TD or less. i don't care who you have on defense or how much you trust them.

#20 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,924
  • Reputation: 890
  • LocationDa City
HUDDLER

Posted 29 April 2013 - 02:53 PM

agreed. this starting out slow thing isn't anyway to prove we've got playmakers.

and if we do, then how is shula going to bring it out of them? what exactly is he going to do to maximize the talent and supposed playmaking ability of this team? by running an old school traditional ball control offense?

im just tired of all this talking, from a lot of guys on the team. shut up and prove to me then because the evidence(games) says different.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users