Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TruthVsComfort

Kentucky Shooting: Boy, 5, Shoots And Kills 2-Year-Old Sister, Police Say

108 posts in this topic

 

 

BURKESVILLE, Ky. — Authorities in southern Kentucky say a 2-year-old girl has been accidentally shot and killed by her 5-year-old brother, who was playing with a .22-caliber rifle he received as a gift.

 

Kentucky State Police said the toddler was shot just after 1 p.m. CDT Tuesday in Cumberland County and was taken to a nearby hospital, where she was later pronounced dead.

 

Cumberland County Coroner Gary White told the Lexington Herald-Leader that the children's mother was at home at the time.

 

White told the newspaper that the boy received the rifle made for youths last year and is used to shooting it. He said the gun was kept in a corner and the family didn't realize a shell was left inside it.

White said the shooting will be ruled accidental.

 

An autopsy is scheduled for Wednesday.

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/30/kentucky-shooting_n_3189828.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

 

Should a 5-year-old be given a damn rifle as a gift??? What the hell is wrong with people. Even Carl in the walking dead is like 12.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He got the gun last year too. WTF are people thinking?

 

My son who is 6 was at a friends house and I got a call asking if they could play with a bb gun. Um no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't give my boy a Red Ryder until he was 8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think cases like this should result in criminal charges, like involuntary manslaughter. fug letting these idiots get off by saying "Oops, it was an accident!"

 

Between choosing to pray for your child instead of taking them to the doctor and giving them guns as "gifts" - it is pretty easy to get rid of children you no longer want and get off with a light or no criminal penalty at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor parenting.

My son got a lever action .22 from my dad for his first birthday. It's been in the box since we've received it, but when he's old enough and mature enough, it'll be his.

5's too early. This is especially true for a rifle.

I got a BB gun at 6, and I wasn't very responsible with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fuging crazy. Got my son an air soft colt 1911 for his 7th birthday. We went over the "it's not a toy" thing as well as gun safety. Only allowed to shoot it with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the point of a small child having access to any kind of gun before even a single pube sprouts? 

 

I mean, seriously?  I'm trying to understand here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the point of a small child having access to any kind of gun before even a single pube sprouts? 

 

I mean, seriously?  I'm trying to understand here.

 

Zombies...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But, TBQH the only time they should have access would be under the supervision of a parent or other RESPONSIBLE adult...

All I did with my BB gun was shoot birds (which I learned to regret pretty fast), targets, and glass objects (some of which I learned a five finger lesson for).

 

There will be a point, though, that I want to be comfortable leaving my kids home alone or with their mom, knowing that if they had to, they could defend themselves or their mother with the deadly force of a firearm. It won't be 5 years old, but I could see early to pre-teen years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's merit is there is discrepancy between words and action.  For instance, Saudi Arabia not being held accountable as they are saying all the right things but doing the opposite of following through.
    • Looks like our DE depth is developing nicely.  Let's see his swim move--no wait--if he starts drowning, we'll never get him back in the boat. I still say they were a bit upset with him last season.  Remember the benching during the game following the altercationwith the coach?  Some people never recover fully from a knee injury, especially if they lack the discipline to rehab properly.  I wounder if that is the case? Seriously--he is a TE.
    • http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/carrier-plant-where-trump-saved-jobs-plans-layoffs/ar-BBBsNjX?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp A plant where jobs were purportedly saved by Donald Trump ahead of his inauguration is set to make at least 600 staff cuts, many before Christmas. Carrier had opted in December 2016 not to move a number of jobs to Mexico from its Indianapolis furnace factory, following a visit to the plant by Trump. The president claimed he had convinced Carrier to retain 1,100 jobs in Indianapolis rather than outsourcing them in Mexico. And of those 1,100 jobs Trump spoke of, 300 had reportedly never been threatened with a move to Mexico—meaning a total of 800 jobs had been saved. But the company has since announced that at least 600 employees at the factory will still be laid off, with the final 290 job cuts coming just ahead of Christmas. In a filing seen by CNN, the company announced it would be making an initial 338 job cuts in July, four in October and a further 290 jobs on December 22, just three days before Christmas. During a press conference at Carrier, Trump said: “that big, big beautiful plant behind us… will be even more beautiful in about seven months from now. They're so happy. They're going to have a great Christmas. That's most important. He added: “And that these companies aren't going to be leaving anymore. They're not going to be taking people's hearts out. They're not going to be announcing, like they did at Carrier, that they're closing up and they're moving to Mexico, over 1,100 jobs. “And by the way, that number is going to go up very substantially as they expand this area, this plant. So the 1,100 is going to be a minimum number,” he said. The plant said at the time the number of jobs saved was closer to 800, but explained it would be replacing some of the jobs that were saved with an automated system in order to save money, although CEO Greg Hayes did say there would be less money saved by the company in doing so than if they moved production to Mexico. Carrier did not immediately respond to Newsweek’s request for comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm thinking of another person I'd like to see get laid off, or fired.