Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TruthVsComfort

Kentucky Shooting: Boy, 5, Shoots And Kills 2-Year-Old Sister, Police Say

108 posts in this topic

 

 

BURKESVILLE, Ky. — Authorities in southern Kentucky say a 2-year-old girl has been accidentally shot and killed by her 5-year-old brother, who was playing with a .22-caliber rifle he received as a gift.

 

Kentucky State Police said the toddler was shot just after 1 p.m. CDT Tuesday in Cumberland County and was taken to a nearby hospital, where she was later pronounced dead.

 

Cumberland County Coroner Gary White told the Lexington Herald-Leader that the children's mother was at home at the time.

 

White told the newspaper that the boy received the rifle made for youths last year and is used to shooting it. He said the gun was kept in a corner and the family didn't realize a shell was left inside it.

White said the shooting will be ruled accidental.

 

An autopsy is scheduled for Wednesday.

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/30/kentucky-shooting_n_3189828.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

 

Should a 5-year-old be given a damn rifle as a gift??? What the hell is wrong with people. Even Carl in the walking dead is like 12.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He got the gun last year too. WTF are people thinking?

 

My son who is 6 was at a friends house and I got a call asking if they could play with a bb gun. Um no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't give my boy a Red Ryder until he was 8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think cases like this should result in criminal charges, like involuntary manslaughter. fug letting these idiots get off by saying "Oops, it was an accident!"

 

Between choosing to pray for your child instead of taking them to the doctor and giving them guns as "gifts" - it is pretty easy to get rid of children you no longer want and get off with a light or no criminal penalty at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor parenting.

My son got a lever action .22 from my dad for his first birthday. It's been in the box since we've received it, but when he's old enough and mature enough, it'll be his.

5's too early. This is especially true for a rifle.

I got a BB gun at 6, and I wasn't very responsible with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fuging crazy. Got my son an air soft colt 1911 for his 7th birthday. We went over the "it's not a toy" thing as well as gun safety. Only allowed to shoot it with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the point of a small child having access to any kind of gun before even a single pube sprouts? 

 

I mean, seriously?  I'm trying to understand here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the point of a small child having access to any kind of gun before even a single pube sprouts? 

 

I mean, seriously?  I'm trying to understand here.

 

Zombies...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But, TBQH the only time they should have access would be under the supervision of a parent or other RESPONSIBLE adult...

All I did with my BB gun was shoot birds (which I learned to regret pretty fast), targets, and glass objects (some of which I learned a five finger lesson for).

 

There will be a point, though, that I want to be comfortable leaving my kids home alone or with their mom, knowing that if they had to, they could defend themselves or their mother with the deadly force of a firearm. It won't be 5 years old, but I could see early to pre-teen years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined