Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TruthVsComfort

Kentucky Shooting: Boy, 5, Shoots And Kills 2-Year-Old Sister, Police Say

108 posts in this topic

So how many do you want? The old saying says three is a crowd, btw. So tell me the number it takes to admit that more than "nobody" supports an outright ban.

Oh, BTW, how is my request for you to provide evidence to back up your claims that gun nuts believe civilians should carry nukes coming along?

 

Why is "nobody" in quotations?  Are you quoting somebody?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is "nobody" in quotations? Are you quoting somebody?

because its easier to use quotes than put the code for italics on a phone. besides, I've been out of college for 8 years now. im not worried about grades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like it might be important, since all you've been doing is arguing semantics for most of this thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's changing to something about people carrying nukes now, I think someone changed his prescription.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think someone will be in denial no matter how many examples I give him. How many do you want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like it might be important, since all you've been doing is arguing semantics for most of this thread

most of this thread?

My posts in this thread consist of being a smart ass to CWG after he admitted to tolling biscuit and asked about either the whereabouts or the existence of a crowd who wants to ban guns.

I couldn't give him the location, but I did reference their existence; it does consist of more than a Nancy Pelosi misquote.

Since what I provided wasn't good enough, I am asking what will satisfy him. That way I will know if the HuffPo poll showing 13% of respondents are in favor of a total gun ban will suffice, or if I need to spend a whole 5 minutes on another Google search.

Your contribution to the thread was asking about quotation marks. Notice I used italics in this post. Do you need anything else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

most of this thread?

My posts in this thread consist of being a smart ass to CWG after he admitted to tolling biscuit and asked about either the whereabouts or the existence of a crowd who wants to ban guns.

I couldn't give him the location, but I did reference their existence; it does consist of more than a Nancy Pelosi misquote.

Since what I provided wasn't good enough, I am asking what will satisfy him. That way I will know if the HuffPo poll showing 13% of respondents are in favor of a total gun ban will suffice, or if I need to spend a whole 5 minutes on another Google search.

Your contribution to the thread was asking about quotation marks. Notice I used italics in this post. Do you need anything else?

 

Well I wasnt trying to single you out for this, but since about page 3 this thread has been completely pointless.  Its been a few people arguing over the semantics of exactly how many/ few people want to ban all guns, which is silly because NOBODY IN THIS THREAD ACTUALLY WANTS TO BAN GUNS

 

Its a completely irrelevant point to any actual discussion, which isnt surprising because its the tinderbox but still

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no serious effort to ban all guns, so I am not sure why that discussion really comes up.  I mean, while things like a flat tax etc are longshots, they actually have some decent backing and are therefore worth debating.  I feel like this is the equivalent of debating whether or not we should have any taxes at all ever and pretending that there is a "crowd" that actually supports that.  Sure, there are more than three people, but who gives a fug?  It isn't ever going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no serious effort to ban all guns, so I am not sure why that discussion really comes up. I mean, while things like a flat tax etc are longshots, they actually have some decent backing and are therefore worth debating. I feel like this is the equivalent of debating whether or not we should have any taxes at all ever and pretending that there is a "crowd" that actually supports that. Sure, there are more than three people, but who gives a fug? It isn't ever going to happen.

You should take a cue from this guy. he knows what he is talking about:

This just in: Tinderbox posters prefer controversy to actual news and debate on real issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One problem: That was in response to someone asking why we were talking about one news story and not another, both about actual happenings in reality, not hypothetical crowds.  Try again.  You'll find a quote of mine that contradicts that if you keep looking. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites