How is this even a legitimate question?
Who's the better receiver?
Posted 10 May 2013 - 12:01 PM
I think many huddlers on here would agree with me that Gettis is a better receiver than Lafail.
"TheRed" and I would like to know from the huddler's opinion, who is better: Brandon LaFail or David Gettis (assuming both are healthy).
Soooooo, about this thread.... Yeah.....
Posted 10 May 2013 - 12:17 PM
The threads will always exist for non-athletes to agonize over. 8 pages later, others cant resist to get involved since its just so preposterous to ask. You can talk about luck and system having everything to do with which player the stats nerds ignore. Chance is everything and sometimes a guy just doesnt get a break.
That being said, if you just open your eyeballs and not be tarded you can see LaFell:
1) blocking better than Gettis
2) catching better than Gettis (more aggressive in the air too)
3) is a better ball carrier than Gettis
4) Isnt afraid to take a hit
Well, 4 is speculation at this point I admit but I have heard murmurs and they seemed to be the kind of murmurs that are true. And btw LaFell isnt slow, he's quite shifty and pretty fast. His acceleration is likely just as good as Gettis' as well.
Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:16 PM
That's a hard question to answer considering Gettis hasn't played in 2 seasons. Now we can all speculate what if Gettis was healthy and what not - but at the time Lafell is better by default. I really cannot see anyone justifying Gettis being better at this point.
Now from a personal perspective and assuming Gettis never was injured, I think he would be better now. I personally believe Gettis is still CAPABLE of being better than Lafell. Hopefully we get the oppurtunity to witness his potential this season with a good QB.
Posted 10 May 2013 - 03:49 PM
Reminds me of the annual "this is gonna be his breakout year!" mantra from Jarrett supporters.
Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:04 PM
'12 LaFell did more than '10 Gettis.
yeah but look who was throwing to gettis lol
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users