I think he would make our secondary better.
Charles Woodson: I will play for any team
Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:11 AM
not sure why we wouldn't sign him for a year or two. sure wouldn't hurt. it's not like we've go much in the way of rising studs in the secondary. I'm not that curious to see what they've got that i would pass him by.
Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:19 AM
Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:20 AM
He'd be a FS on this team. Would you start him over Godfrey at this point? If not he'd most likely have play on STs as a backup...and we know thar ain't happning at his age
He would start wherever our weakest spot is in the secondary. Backup? lol
Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:22 AM
Unless you want him as a corner it makes little sense to bring him in. We need corner help not safety help.
Our S's are weak.
Woodson at FS and Godfrey at SS is better than what we have right now.
Woodson is a shell of himself....but he is twice the S Godfrey is.
Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:24 AM
He's better than any of our safeties, and he's still probably better than any of our corners. He's old and injury prone at this point, but there is no risk in a one year deal.
Posted 10 May 2013 - 07:17 AM
remember when we all laughed at the saints when they signed darren sharper
Posted 10 May 2013 - 07:19 AM
Posted 10 May 2013 - 07:23 AM
Even if we just signed him to mentor some of the young guys. I don't see any harm in bringing him in.
also, name one starter on all our secondary outside of the nickel slot....that Woodson wouldn't be better than what we are slated to put on the field
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users