Jump to content





Photo
* * * * - 2 votes

100 posts required to start new thread


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
88 replies to this topic

#1 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,961
MFCEO

Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:51 AM

In an effort to minimize the disruption of people with no life who seem to take joy in spending a lot of time on annoying things that are undone in 2 clicks, I have once again instituted a 100 post requirement before a new thread can be created.

 

A custom query has been run to make this retroactive. So if you used to be able to make topics but now can't, you will again when you hit 100 posts.

 

 

That is all.

 

 

 



#2 logic1977

logic1977

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • posts: 422
  • Reputation: 71
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:56 AM

Yay!



#3 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,961
MFCEO

Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:57 AM

Upon further review I have decided to increase the requirement to 320 posts



#4 DOMOMAN

DOMOMAN

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 16-January 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 162
  • Reputation: 58
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:08 AM

Guess it's back to lurking for me



#5 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,798
  • Reputation: 7,960
Moderators

Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:13 AM

thank-you-46.gif



#6 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,798
  • Reputation: 7,960
Moderators

Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:14 AM

Guess it's back to lurking for me

the only way you can participate is if you start threads?



#7 BelgianPantherFan

BelgianPantherFan

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 19-November 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 516
  • Reputation: 252
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:17 AM

I have no problem with this.

 

#startsspammingsoicanmakeathread



#8 Toundra

Toundra

    100% French meat

  • Joined: 18-March 11
  • posts: 2,153
  • Reputation: 634
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 06:47 AM

Bwood must be that (_°_) from the Charlotte observer forum.. well.. back then.



#9 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,792
  • Reputation: 9,595
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:06 AM

Bwood will be back.



#10 G spot

G spot

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 22-April 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 131
  • Reputation: 38
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:25 AM

how about for members under ___ post count, have mods approve the thread before it can be posted, a prescreen?



#11 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,961
MFCEO

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:25 AM

Its impossible to perma ban anyone if they have absolutely no life and there is no end to their desperation to be one of the most pathetic people on the internet.

 

All we can do is put up roadblocks to discourage people from doing so.



#12 mjligon

mjligon

    @mleezy53

  • Joined: 30-December 08
  • posts: 3,315
  • Reputation: 1,459
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:29 AM

Awesomw.

#13 ThatNiggaManny

ThatNiggaManny

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 01-February 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 113
  • Reputation: 23
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:37 AM

Well at least I have my dign....nevermind.



#14 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,292
  • Reputation: 3,416
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:38 AM

Upon further review I have decided to increase the requirement to 320 posts

After last night's "gay" thread, this is warranted.

 

I've seen proclamations many times that didn't work, or didn't stick. I hope this time is different.

 

Editing thread title to reflect 320 may tamp down confusion.



#15 BigEric

BigEric

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 14-February 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 141
  • Reputation: 54
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:41 AM

Last night was pretty bad, I don't know how someone could have less to do.