Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

IRS IG Report: Targeting Conservatives Began In 2010


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
103 replies to this topic

#1 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,117
  • Reputation: 184
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 11:48 AM

http://abcnews.go.co...atives-in-2010/

 

The targeting of conservatives by the IRS started earlier and was more extensive than the IRS acknowledged last week, according to a draft IRS inspector general report obtained by ABC News.

As we reported on “Good Morning America” this morning, the IRS began targeting “Tea Party or similar organizations” in March 2010. That was when the Cincinnati-based IRS unit responsible for overseeing the applications for tax exempt status starting using the phrases “Tea Party,” “patriots” and “9/12″ to search for applications warranting greater scrutiny.

During this first phase, 10 Tea Party cases were identified. By April of 2010, 18 Tea Party organizations were targeted, including three that had already been approved for tax-exempt status.

By June 2011, the unit had flagged over 100 Tea Party-related applications and the criteria used to scrutinize organizations had grown considerably, flagging not just “Tea Party” or “Patriot” in group names, but also groups that were working on issues like “government debt,” “taxes” and even organizations making statements that “criticize how the country is being run.”

The report, done by the Inspector General for the IRS, also shows that senior IRS officials in Washington was aware of what was going on as early as August 4, 2011 when, according to the report, the IRS chief counsel held a meeting with the IRS’s Rulings and Agreements unit “so that everyone would have the latest information on the issue.”

 

 

Not surprising ... there will be more to this story ....



#2 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,558
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:00 PM

Obama's Obamagate

#3 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,854
  • Reputation: 4,612
Administrators

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:09 PM

Nothing to see here.

The Government is here to help us.

 



#4 Darth Biscuit

Darth Biscuit

    Dark Lord

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 34,973
  • Reputation: 9,072
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:22 PM

We should all be happy to pay our fair share... more even. Taxes are GOOOOOOD. Gov't is GOOOOOOD.

Here... take my money... please.

#5 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 23,778
  • Reputation: 19,973
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:52 PM

a federal tax agency is paying close attention to groups heavily invested in not paying taxes by searching for related groups "working on issues like taxes?"

pardon my lack of outrage

#6 SZ James (banned)

SZ James (banned)

  • Joined: 24-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,558
  • Reputation: 3,626
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:54 PM

a federal tax agency is paying close attention to groups heavily invested in not paying taxes by searching for related groups "working on issues like taxes?"

pardon my lack of outrage

this is actually p outrageous

its like racial profiling

#7 Panthers_Lover

Panthers_Lover

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,117
  • Reputation: 184
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:55 PM

a federal tax agency is paying close attention to groups heavily invested in not paying taxes by searching for related groups "working on issues like taxes?"

pardon my lack of outrage

 

Singling out specific groups with specific ideologies is wrong and illegal. Hell, even Obama said so.



#8 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 23,778
  • Reputation: 19,973
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:58 PM

like homeland security and radical islam? there's a difference between profiling and due dilligence when red flags pop up.

#9 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 23,814
  • Reputation: 3,102
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:59 PM

Would this be considered over reach?


No big deal. We are lucky we get to pay taxes.

#10 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,854
  • Reputation: 4,612
Administrators

Posted 13 May 2013 - 01:09 PM

like homeland security and radical islam? there's a difference between profiling and due dilligence when red flags pop up.

 

 

What if I consider both foundations for likely terrorism?

 

 

My concern here is someone directed the IRS to look into these groups for some reason.

 

It appears to be because they are questioning the tax system and/or were mostly (read all) conservative.

 

Replace "Tea Party" with Black/White/Baptist/Pagan/Short/Tall etc. The IRS was instructed to profile.  Peeps want to know why.



#11 Harris Aballah

Harris Aballah

    Fayette-Villian

  • Joined: 22-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,090
  • Reputation: 449
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 01:17 PM

Well, this definately had nothing to do with the mid terms. Just like Benghazi had nothing to do with terrorists.



#12 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,267
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 13 May 2013 - 01:17 PM

Too bad you really can't throw a Y on Obama and make it Obamayism like McCarthyism....