Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Dpantherman

The Panthers contacted Charles Woodson's agent...HOWEVER

Recommended Posts

Tossed by this idea. While he was a great player I believe he got burned real bad a couple times last year.  Clearly not the same player as a couple years ago.  Switch him to Safety like Rod Woodson did might not be a bad idea but we didn't save money on D'Will to just throw it at an aging veteran.  I think we should wait until June 1 to see what pops out on the market.

 

Gettleman is too wise to start being stupid with the money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be a good move if we could land him for about 1.3-1.7m.

He provides two things we need, depth in the secondary and leadership in the lockeroom. I love the idea if having Cam around Woodson, he could really learn some things about being a true professional.

We have the cap room to make a move, and a one year contract won't tie down any future cap sace past next year. Giving us as much room as possible to sign Cam and Hardy to new contracts. It also buys us a little more time to bring in young talented players, and build through the draft.

The dude is still a baller and would be a perfect stop gap for this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


We already have media headaches with Cam. If Charlotte and the Panthers ever want to put on their big boy pants and play with true stardom, then stuff like this, or signing a troublemaker neet to be non-issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodes is younger and cheaper than Woodson. Simply put: Rhodes is the better value. I think that we have enough strong personalities in the locker room to make Rhodes' sexual preferences a background issue, if an issue at all. I would be more concerned about Rhodes lying about it than anything else. That speaks to his character.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodes is younger and cheaper than Woodson. Simply put: Rhodes is the better value. I think that we have enough strong personalities in the locker room to make Rhodes' sexual preferences a background issue, if an issue at all. I would be more concerned about Rhodes lying about it than anything else. That speaks to his character.

 

 

I think being a rump ranger will drop his value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woodson's old and I dont say that often as many times as I have had discussions around here about the subject. I think the team that signs him is making a statement "we need a cb badly". The teams in their division will notice the desperation and plan accordingly as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




The only problem with him coming is he doesn't play SS.  Godfrey needs to stay at FS.  So in actuality, he isn't really an upgrade except his leadership ability (which we are assuming he is).

Not really worried about that imo. He could definitely find a spot on the field with the secondary we have. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhodes is younger and cheaper than Woodson. Simply put: Rhodes is the better value. I think that we have enough strong personalities in the locker room to make Rhodes' sexual preferences a background issue, if an issue at all. I would be more concerned about Rhodes lying about it than anything else. That speaks to his character.

 

He did lie about it. Cant remember the exact article but thats what it was about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think being a rump ranger will drop his value.

 

I don't think that was necessary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,879
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Alex stump
    Joined
  • Topics

×