Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CarolinaPanthers8789

Judge Calls Jordan "Greedy"

8 posts in this topic

Link: http://www.cbssports.com/nba/blog/eye-on-basketball/22419728/judge-calls-michael-jordan-greedy-as-lawsuit-case-drags-on
 

Michael Jordan is seeking $5 million in damages after a grocery store included his name and number in a congratulatory advertisement in 2009, according to the Chicago Tribune.
 
On the bright side for Jordan, federal Judge Milton Shadur has already ruled that Dominck's grocery store is liable for using his name and image, but Shadur doesn't agree with the fair-market price that Jordan's lawyers have set.

 

“I thought the demand was greedy,” Shadur said of the lawsuit. The advertisement in question was included as a one-page ad in a Sports Illustrated issue applauding Jordan's induction into the Hall of Fame. The ad also included a $2-off coupon for a steak.

 

For what it's worth, Jordan's lawyers have also said that after the legal fees, any damages won would likely go to charity.

 

I'll admit, Jordan is a greedy individual but if he wants to use that $5 million in damages to make sure that Howard and Paul find their way to Charlotte; then I don't two sh*ts about how greedy he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kind of sad that you can't congratulate someone without getting sued. The judge is right. That was greedy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kind of sad that you can't congratulate someone without getting sued. The judge is right. That was greedy.

The judge ruled in his favor. The issue isn't that he is suing, he is fully justified, the issue is how much he was trying to get. As a complete non-lawyer who only reads about this kind of stuff in the news, it seems asking for a ridiculous sum and then later settling for a more reasonable amount is common practice so this whole thing sounds like no big deal to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think about it though, the only reason they did it was to attach their store logo to Michael Jordan. They really were trying to get customers into their doors by "congratulating" (even though it really wasn't their full mission in the ad) Michael Jordan and make customers think "wow, they like MJ, let's go get our steak there"

 

So I think MJ was warranted to sue, but as the judge said, a $5 million price tag was a bit steep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think its greedy. I think he has to make an example out of someone. Jordan is a highly marketable commodity.  If this was permitted without penalty then every business would feel free to use his name/likeness to sell their products.

 

I do however think he should donate that money to charity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering how much a Michael Jordan endorsement must cost, I'd say 5 mill is actually kind of cheap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, it was irresponsible of a judge to put something so derogetory into the hands of the media like that. The whole situation combined with the fact that a judge called him greedy allows the media to have a field day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think its greedy. I think he has to make an example out of someone. Jordan is a highly marketable commodity.  If this was permitted without penalty then every business would feel free to use his name/likeness to sell their products.

 

I do however think he should donate that money to charity.

This.

 

The penalty has to be steep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had always assumed she was dardaroarroar
    • elton simpson was monitored over a 9 year period (fbi claims there were breaks but at the least there were still years of monitoring) and at least $132,000 in cash was spent on one informant alone. here's the fbi's version in the immediate aftermath of the shooting:   Three hours before gunmen attacked an anti-Prophet Muhammad event in Garland, Texas on Sunday, the FBI sent a bulletin to local police with a photo of one of the shooters, Elton Simpson, noting that he was "interested in the event," FBI director James Comey said. At the time, the FBI had no reason to believe that Simpson intended to attack the event, Comey told reporters Thursday. Nor did the agency know that Simpson was already on his way there. Comey also said that he does not believe that the police officer who shot Simpson and the second gunman, Soofi Nadir, was aware of the bulletin. He went on to say that while the investigation of the Phoenix gunmen is far from complete, Comey believes the FBI acted appropriately. ..... Two weeks before the Garland event, which invited artists to draw illustrations of Muhammad, the FBI and Homeland Security warned law enforcement agencies across the country that it was at risk of being targeted by Islamic extremists. The advisory noted that supporters of ISIS and other terror groups had posted links to the contest on Twitter. Simpson was reading those posts, and communicated with an American in Somalia who'd called for attacking the event, investigators have said. The FBI then developed information that Simpson might be interested in traveling to Garland, Comey said. The Sunday bulletin followed. ..... The FBI now has hundreds of investigations of potential home grown extremists under way, with cases open in every state. "I know there are other Elton Simpsons out there," Comey said. Finding them, however, is a "very hard task," he said. Investigators can follow messages that are posted on public twitter accounts. But ISIS recruiters are steering people off Twitter into encrypted forums, which the government cannot see, Comey said. "Its the old going-dark problem, in living color," said Comey. He added: "We have hundreds working on it around the clock. But in almost every case of violence, someone saw something. A friend, a family member. Its more important than ever for people to speak up."     ^^^just a reminder for the bolded parts that a federal agent was in the car directly behind them as they opened their doors and began their short lived attack
    • Looks like it has potential. BvS was terrible. I will say the extended version was a better film but still not good. Suicide Squad was one of the worst films I've seen in a while.  That said of course I will waste my money and go see this. I hope they bring back Batman's more cunning qualities in future films. I got the sense that in BvS he was a what you see is what you get type of guy. You don't get the feeling that he has something up his sleeve at all times. Which was something Nolan/Bale had, almost Bond-esque.