Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jarhead

Other than DT what areas have we really improved?

52 posts in this topic

Guess we shouldn't watch this season since you've already predetermined that we'll suck.

I don't know about you but my entertainment isn't contingent on wins, any team with Cam and Kuechly will be exciting to watch, and even if our destination isn't that sunny the journey is the fun part. It's possible to be a level headed and realistic fan with reasonable expectations and still have fun and enjoy watching. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about you but my entertainment isn't contingent on wins, any team with Cam and Kuechly will be exciting to watch, and even if our destination isn't that sunny the journey is the fun part. It's possible to be a level headed and realistic fan with reasonable expectations and still have fun and enjoy watching.

Well the way I see it is we've been extremely close to winning a majority of our games. If we've improved slightly coaching/players wise, we could vert well be good enough to get over that hump. I feel like we could easily have a playoff caliber team.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Special teams should be much improved with all the work we've done at the bottom of the roster.  CB I think hasn't necessarily improved, but we have a lot more depth there, giving us flexibility and not thinking the world is over when a starter goes down.  Safety gets an automatic improvement with Nakamura not starting.  Our backfield's production will improve simply because Chud isn't here right now.

 

We are also a very young team, many areas that are already strength will improve just from natural progression and experience.  Guys like Hardy, Keuchly, Cam, Lafell, Norman and Josh Thomas all have room to improve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked Mitchell when we played the Raiders last year. I think he will be an improvement at S. Anyone at CB is better at cb than norman and gamble

You can't be serious or sober.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The offensive guys seem extremely confident in the interviews I've seen, I think one more year in the system and a return to the power run game has everyone feeling good. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. DL
2. WR
3. LB
4. S

DL = Lose Ron Edwards, gain Star, Kawann, and Cole.
WR = Lose Louis Murphy, gain Hixon & Ginn Jr
LB = Lose James Anderson, gain Blackburn & Klein, Beason returns
S = Lose Nakamura, Godfrey to FS, potentially Mitchell at SS.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

QB - better - played whole year healthy, learned lots of valuable lessons, showed that he learned them.

 

RB - marginally better - Added depth and another weapon.

 

WR - better - The return of injured players, the development of prospects, one more year of catching bullets from Cam and learning his nuances, oh ya and those two guys Ginn and Hixon who werent strangers to being called "playmakers" before arriving here. New systems can do wonders for a career . . . so can a new QB.

 

OL - better - The return of an All Pro center plus everyone else providing continuity. We'll see about Gross, but all signs are that he's still ready to ball. Adding Kugz is not too impacting to me because he's going to be learning all year I would think.

 

TE - same - I wouldnt rate any of the movement here significant yet

 

 

----

 

DT - better - lol nuff said

 

DE - same - so far no big changes here, but it should be noted that Alexander is in a possible break out year.

 

LB - better - the return of an All Pro LB and leader of our defense. The addition of some baddass depth. Wow LB is still our strongest spot by far.

 

CB - better - Gamble was injured and didnt return. Added a savvy vet and gave some young guns with potential a LOT of snaps last year to improve.

 

S - Better - Nakamura will go back to ST's if he makes the team, nuff said.

 

 

Coaching - who knows? Id like to say Chico got a year of experience but coaching is so complex that I dunno if that matters. I guess it does, but how much? whatever, different discussion maybe than what Jarhead was looking for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory we upgraded qb as Cam should be better next year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to answer your Q....number one improvement : David G....#2 Shula as OC (our offense made what's his name look good-now our OC will make our offense look unbeatable)...and as things evolve we will see how good our RB's REALLY are and please don't forget OLSEN-he can catch anything as good as any other WR we could have signed...now for the unknowns: AE coming out...Gettis?...Ginn...and CAM maturing, Baby we have alot to look forward to...we have it this year, I really believe that!

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to answer your Q....number one improvement : David G....#2 Shula as OC (our offense made what's his name look good-now our OC will make our offense look unbeatable)...and as things evolve we will see how good our RB's REALLY are and please don't forget OLSEN-he can catch anything as good as any other WR we could have signed...now for the unknowns: AE coming out...Gettis?...Ginn...and CAM maturing, Baby we have alot to look forward to...we have it this year, I really believe that!

I think people think the present day Double Trouble are much better than they really are....

That doesn't mean they suck....but they are overrated even if underutilized the past few years at this stage. Stewart's injuries are naggin year after year....hard to imagine he isn't declining in the process. Williams wasn't impressive last year. Good....not great.

We need to run....but only for balance. The key to our offense is Cam not who runs it at RB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • http://www.alternet.org/grayzone-project/fbi-isis-garland-texas-shooting-undercover-agent The first attack on U.S. soil for which ISIS claimed responsibility—a 2015 shooting in Garland, Texas—was instigated by the FBI, according to an investigation by CBS' "60 Minutes" and government documents obtained by an attorney involved in the case. In a macabre twist, an undercover FBI agent who encouraged one of the shooters to "tear up Texas" was also physically present at the scene of the crime, mere feet away from the shooters. Prior to that, a separate informant was paid $132,000 by the FBI to pretend for three years to be friends with the future shooter. When the man found out his supposed friend had taped more than 1,500 hours of their conversations on behalf of the intelligence agency, he withdrew from his religious community and eventually fell into online religious extremism. ...... On May 3, 2015, two Islamist extremist gunmen opened fire at an exhibit for cartoons of the Islamic prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas. The contest featured key figures in the Islamophobia industry, including anti-Muslim demagogue Pamela Geller and extreme-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders. The intentionally provocative exhibit was swarming with security, including dozens of police officers, snipers and a SWAT team. The heavily armed attackers injured a security guard outside the building before they were themselves promptly shot by snipers and killed. ISIS soon after took credit for the shooting. There is no evidence that ISIS organized the attack, but the shooters had been independently radicalized and were inspired by the genocidal extremist group. In the two years since, the Garland shooting has been used to justify a vast array of anti-Muslim policies and measures. A new investigation by the investigation team at "60 Minutes," nevertheless, shows that the FBI was deeply implicated in the attack. ..... After the trial, Maynard was given 60 pages of declassified messages between an undercover FBI agent and one of the shooters, Elton Simpson. These documents showed that, less than three weeks before the attack, the FBI agent had told Simpson to "Tear up Texas." This "to me was an encouragement to Simpson," the attorney told "60 Minutes." The government denied that the text constituted incitement, but the FBI's involvement did not end there. "60 Minutes" reported that the U.S. government admitted in an affidavit that the undercover FBI agent also physically "traveled to Garland, Texas, and was present ... at the event." "I was shocked," Maynard told the news program. "I was shocked that the government hadn't turned this over. I wanted to know when did he get there, why was he there?" Documents the government gave to the attorney showed that the FBI agent had in fact been in a car behind the two shooters at the time of the attack. The undercover FBI agent even used his cell phone, several feet away, to film the building's security guard seconds before he was shot by the Islamist extremists. "It's stunning," Maynard told "60 Minutes." "The idea that he's right there 30 seconds before the attack happens is just incredible to me." ..... The undercover FBI agent fled the scene of the crime before being stopped at gunpoint and detained by Garland police. ..... Dabla Deng, the informant, pretended to be Simpson's friend for three years, "60 Minutes" reported. Deng taped more than 1,500 hours of their conversations. When Simpson "found out that this guy was spying on him, and taping him and then finding out that the government was doing that, I think something clicked in him," recalled Usama Shami, president of the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix. "And the mosque, we couldn't do anything." "He felt that the mosque had abandoned him?" Anderson Cooper asked. "Yes. And he felt that a lot of people had abandoned him. And that's why he stopped coming to the mosque," Shami said. After this, Simpson moved in with his friend Nadir Soofi, who "60 Minutes" noted "had just had a bitter break-up and the pizza parlor he owned was going out of business." The two alienated men drifted into extremist religious communities online, and were attracted by ISIS recruiters.
    • i actually took this test a year ago because i was talking to this girl who was a psych major and really invested in this test. then i was talking to this other girl who was also a psych major and she thought there wasn't much to it, she basically didn't have respect for it. if i took it today it'd probably line up the same. 
    •    There isn't a problem taking a tackle usually. The problem would be taking any of THESE OTs that high. If there was someone close to that, we would have risked so much on Kalil.