Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cam's second half improvement

26 posts in this topic

Posted

Wilson's looks so drastic because of how poorly he started out as well. His worst game was also Cam's worst game. But he turned it on nicely and carried that through the rest of the year not long after, while Cam had to wait a few more weeks for Chud to get his head out of his ass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yeah you're delusional if you think Bradford is consistently on the same level as Aaron Rodgers.

Still interesting though.

That's not what he's saying at all. For the first have the season lets saying Rodgers has a 96.4 passer rating. Then the second half of the second he have a 96.8 passer rating. He's stayed the same. While Bradford can have 79.2 passer rating the first half and a 79.4 passer rating the last half they both with show as staying the same. He's not staying Bradford is on par with Rodgers just that the graph isn't showing the context of they've been throwing. So blanket statements like the ones in the middle are more consistent isn't completely true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Cam will only get better as time goes on and are any of us bold enough to say that cam on any team with a decent defense in 11 and a competent OC in 12 wouldn't have made the playoffs? My point is, we have a stud under center and we may finally have those two aforementioned things to complement him(competent OC and decent defense). This could be a great year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That's not what he's saying at all. For the first have the season lets saying Rodgers has a 96.4 passer rating. Then the second half of the second he have a 96.8 passer rating. He's stayed the same. While Bradford can have 79.2 passer rating the first half and a 79.4 passer rating the last half they both with show as staying the same. He's not staying Bradford is on par with Rodgers just that the graph isn't showing the context of they've been throwing. So blanket statements like the ones in the middle are more consistent isn't completely true

 

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

 

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

 

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

 

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

it's 2nd half of the season, not 2nd half of games.

 

So "crunch time" only applies to the second half of football games?

 

Period?

 

And never at any other time?

 

So winning 6 out of your last 8 games to ensure you make the playoffs isn't doing it at "crunch time"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

 

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

 

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

 

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass. 

 

thank you for clearing this up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So "crunch time" only applies to the second half of football games?

 

Period?

 

And never at any other time?

 

So winning 6 out of your last 8 games to ensure you make the playoffs isn't doing it at "crunch time"?

 

i don't know. when people say crunch time i think the end of games.

 

as for the bolded statement, you were the one saying he wasn't performing during crunch time so i don't know why you're directing that towards me. i just clarified what the graph was illustrating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

 

as for the bolded statement, you were the one saying he wasn't performing during crunch time so i don't know why you're directing that towards me. i just clarified what the graph was illustrating.

 

That's exactly what I was saying.

 

 Because Luck's performance was less-than-average in most of those games BUT HIS TEAM WAS WINNING ANYWAY.

 

Luck's worst performances of the year were in the 2nd half of the season in games they critically needed to win to get into the playoffs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass.

Yeah you didn't listen either. Good job. I said not completely true. While its true they were consistent they weren't on the same level which what i was trying to tell the person I responded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You know who I am getting a little sick of getting a ton of attention: Ryan Tannehill- the guy hasn't proven anything, yet people are picking the Dolphins to win the division. Brady could pick three random huddlers  to be his starting wide-outs and still be a better QB than Tannehill next year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Nice graph bro!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

That wasn't a joke....you did your research

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites