Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jamos14

Microsoft reverses stance on XboxOne

78 posts in this topic

At the end of the day I want the XBOX 180 to sell well (although I won't be buying one).

 

The last thing we need is a monopoly on the console market. Competition is great for the consumer.

 

This would have never happened if Sony weren't competing with them.  So thank you Sony.  I still don't like the idea of every console having to have a Kinect.  I have no use for it.  Now all they need to do to definitely get my business back is offer the new Xbox without the Kinect.  As it stands I'm probably still leaning towards getting a PS4, but I don't think I'll be getting one on day one in any case.  I may see how it all plays out and see if either of the hardware have any major issues.  I'm not going through the RROD again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh sweet jesus I can finally get my dudebro shooter fix

THANK YOU MICROSOFT

*SLUUUURP*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Xbox one should be known as XBOX 180 from now on, because that is what it is for MS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinect requirement is still a deal-breaker... not interested in having a(nother?) camera and mic hooked up at all times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea of dumping used games, I think MS fuged up by not going further and eliminating physical discs.  The Steam model is the way to go. 

 

I would rather see the money spent on used game sales go to the developer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Kinect is still a problem for me, although I was hoping they'd keep the rest and go the steam route and offer weekly sales to make the DRM not a big deal. People on Steam don't care about the DRM anymore because of all the sales. 

 

 

I wasn't getting a Xbox one at launch because I wanted to make sure they were going to have the sales before jumping aboard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started out with the ps one. Then ps2, moved to the xbox 360, bought a ps3. I'm now going back to the Playstation solely because of the price. Before it was because of all the bull MS wants to RAM down our throats and this whole "elitist" demographic they are trying to create by their initial plans. I love the xbox 360 but I'm not paying 500 dollars for that system. Some may say $100 isn't much savings but when you're not making dollars, you tend to be frugal. Ms has rubbed me the wrong way as of late. The PS4 has so much going for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea of dumping used games, I think MS fuged up by not going further and eliminating physical discs. The Steam model is the way to go.

I would rather see the money spent on used game sales go to the developer

if they do that though they would need to substantially drop the prices on their games like on steam and they won't do that so it doesn't matter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if they do that though they would need to substantially drop the prices on their games like on steam and they won't do that so it doesn't matter

 

Dropping the price in the months after a game comes out is profit-maximizing 101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You do realize no one wanted RyanCare/ObamaCare Lite to pass, right? If anything, the media and democrats has made themselves absolute fools lately. STILL no evidence Trump colluded with Russia whatsoever, which is quite the funny irony in this whole conspiracy. Trump inherited a mess. Hard to fix this mess when you got crybaby globalists and dems everywhere.    
    • I hate this DG analogy so much.  It only makes sense in the context of an efficient market where teams are rational, have perfect information, and scouts are always right about players.  But we have ample evidence that is not the case.  Sometimes, talented players just don't work out.  Injuries derail careers.  Teams make oddball picks.  Sometimes, you are just wrong about a player (see Ealy, Kony). I like him a lot, but DG's habit of always trading up / never trading down may ultimately be his downfall in CAR.  It results in a lack of depth across the roster and it makes your roster very vulnerable to i) injuries (see 2015 vs. 2016) and ii) missing on evals.  If we missed on Funchess (jury still out), that hurts - but missing on Funchess when you traded multiple picks to get him compounds the issue. Trading up and trading down are both valid strategies - but I'd suggest balancing the two strategies would improve your chances of long-term success.
    • He is worth #8 pick. I'd like to see him next to Newton on the field.