I know that you're not intentionally being dense but while homosexuals as a group were never enslaved, they most certainly have been victims of violence in a historical context. Hell even the KKK loves lynching them just as much as a black person.
I'm surely hoping that you aren't trying to make the case that the worst type of abuse that homosexuals have ever had to worry about is name calling. Because if you are then you're fuging retarded.
Dude, this is not mathematics. You can't remove slavery from your equation to equate the plight of Robinson with that of homosexuals. Your point lost credibility the second you exempt slavery.
Christians, muslims, retards, handicaps, Asians, Caucasians, you name it, have all been victims of violence. Why not use them in your equation?
And you don't get the point, this is not about level of abuse or atrocity. Race and sexuality are two different things. Are you making the argument that if blacks are 'accepted' homosexuals should be accepted too?