Two consenting adults agree to something makes it "right" or " correct" or "morally defendable" or "proper" or "ok"?
My wife and I agreed that her step-mother-in-law should be murdered for breaking up her mom and dad's marriage. We are two consenting adults so I guess it's OK.
If you wanna defend your position have at it brah. Perversion is perversion son. No two ways about it.'
All of your "arguments" are one's I've heard before, and I still find myself wondering how anyone, such as yourself, could convince themselves that what they are saying is grounded in any sort of logical legitimacy. The mother example? REALLY? Normally I'd attempt to say "that doesn't make sense, here's why: x, y, and z, but the logical fallacies of that statement are hopelessly beyond any form of redeemable idiocy.
If people don't choose to be gay then that's a form of mental retardation. Any dude that feels secure cuddled up with another dude is kind of off. Any dude that grows up thinking he can't wait to buy that dress his aunt is wearing isn't all there.
There are all types of retardation and being a functional retard is still chemically off. Once America diagnose them as they are then they will be accepted but to think they are all there and everyone acting like its normal isn't doing them a favor.
Today on the Huddle: Gay people are comparable to conspiring murderers, and also retarded.