Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

NFL Third Place Game?


  • Please log in to reply
82 replies to this topic

#51 chef17

chef17

    Senior Asshole

  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,504
  • Reputation: 105
HUDDLER

Posted 01 July 2013 - 02:44 PM

http://en.wikipedia....ki/Playoff_Bowl



#52 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 01 July 2013 - 02:54 PM


Vince Lombardi detested the Playoff Bowl, coaching in the games following the 1963 and 1964 seasons, after winning NFL titles in 1961and 1962. To his players, he called it "the 'poo Bowl', ...a losers' bowl for losers." This lack of motivation may explain his Packers' rare postseason defeat in the 1964 game (January 1965) to the St. Louis Cardinals. After that loss, he fumed about "a hinky-dink football game, held in a hinky-dink town, played by hinky-dink players. That's all second place is – hinky dink."[1]

 

it's funny that lombardi got autocorrected calling it a sh1t bowl. i thought that poo was funny.



#53 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 48,880
  • Reputation: 9,434
HUDDLER

Posted 01 July 2013 - 03:08 PM

http://www.urbandict...erm=hinky dinky

 

 

1. hinky dinky
3 up, 1 down  
(adj.) Term used to describe a person/place/thing that is of questionable quality.

 

 

 



#54 Gucci Mane

Gucci Mane

    Trap God

  • Joined: 02-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,966
  • Reputation: 1,590
  • LocationKitchen
HUDDLER

Posted 01 July 2013 - 03:59 PM

Using the Playoff Bowl (and loss) as motivation in 1965, the Packers won the first of three consecutive NFL championships from 1965-67.

 

Sounds like vince was just pissed that his team sucked that year ['64]... Thats why he didnt like the concept.



#55 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 01 July 2013 - 04:02 PM

or it could be that he knew that the only thing that matters is first place. the only reason you play is because you want to get that championship. nothing is going to happen to make third place something worth playing for. there are no consolation prizes and we don't need to make any.



#56 Gucci Mane

Gucci Mane

    Trap God

  • Joined: 02-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,966
  • Reputation: 1,590
  • LocationKitchen
HUDDLER

Posted 01 July 2013 - 04:09 PM

or it could be that he knew that the only thing that matters is first place. the only reason you play is because you want to get that championship. nothing is going to happen to make third place something worth playing for. there are no consolation prizes and we don't need to make any.

 

no one is arguing the first part.. i've said that repeatedly in this thread.

 

I'm just saying if its any more popular than a preseason game, then the league should do it. More football for those that want to watch. The stars can sit if they want. And a little more revenue for the league/ participating teams if they want.

 

It doesnt have to be this glorified event, just another game. thats it, thats all.



#57 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 01 July 2013 - 04:16 PM

if there's no incentive for players/team to play, then there's no incentive for the game to exist at all.

 

no one wants to be third best.



#58 Gucci Mane

Gucci Mane

    Trap God

  • Joined: 02-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,966
  • Reputation: 1,590
  • LocationKitchen
HUDDLER

Posted 01 July 2013 - 04:44 PM

ok.. im going to stop repeating myself cause you cant seem to comprehend much.

 

 



#59 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 01 July 2013 - 05:40 PM

yeah. thats probably it. i couldn't be just because its really not that good of an idea and whatever incentives you dreamed up for this didn't sound all that appealing and wouldn't be worth the effort in pursuing because the cost involved would outweigh any real benefits, esp. for a game that in the big scheme of things would just be a reprise of the original poo bowl.

 

 



#60 Udogg

Udogg

    Cardiac Victim since 95

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,642
  • Reputation: 1,606
HUDDLER

Posted 01 July 2013 - 05:42 PM

Ok, lets put it this way...a 3rd place game in football makes no sense.  Maybe if it was...

 

A. A fans choice game.  1 game not involving Superbowl Particpants that was voted on by a poll.   I'm probably down for that.

 

B. Arch rival game.  Game involving arch rivals ie.. cowboy redskin, falcons panthers, etc etc.. I would watch. Especially if the losing team has to put the other teams logo on their field for the next home game.  Or maybe like college football some kind of made up trophy like a boot or something.

 

C. Maybe a match up between the last 2 teams out of the playoffs.... kind of a stretch ..however

 

 

I would rather see any of those before a 3rd place "MEANINGLESS" game.    Say I don't know about football, economics, the heart of players, etc ..etc..  IDC.  Would I want to see a game that has teams actually playing rather than going through the motions,  yes definitely.  However, no matter how you spin it, a 3rd place game means nothing in the NFL.  

 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users