Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DaveThePanther2008

Clark Judge what a hater

25 posts in this topic

Saw this on cbssport.com   This guy always hates on Carolina.

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/clark-judge/22773299/who-are-this-years-colts-redskins-we-have-four-candidates

 

He picks four teams to be the Next Colts and Redskins.  

 

His second pick is New Orleans and his "Added Bonus" is "The Saints last for games are teams with losing records in 2012 including Carolina twice"

 

Mr. Judge did you watch football at all in 2012?  Carolina swept New Orleans.   I think between the two teams Carolina and New Orleans, Carolina has a better shot at being the "Colts or Redskins in 2013" whatever that mean. 

 

Yeah he is right but the records were the same it isn't like we were 2-14.  Clark Judge has always hated on the Panthers.  This one not directly but you got my point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the hate, absolutely love it. Keep piling it on.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't say I've ever heard of the guy.

 

I wish I had a dollar for every prediction that an NFL Analyst said actually came true. On second thought, no I don't because I'd be homeless.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next Colts/Skins as in vastly overrated headed by a QB that is equally, if not more overrated?

 

Does this mean Cam is gonna have a lower passer rating than Gabbert like Luck did last season?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next Colts/Skins as in vastly overrated headed by a QB that is equally, if not more overrated?

 

Does this mean Cam is gonna have a lower passer rating than Gabbert like Luck did last season?

 

God I hope not.... lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you guys get so bent out of shape over what some talking head says?  None of it matters.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who gives a poo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you guys get so bent out of shape over what some talking head says? None of it matters.

It's because davethepanther has to angrily respond to everybody who doesn't conform to his opinion that the panthers are an elite team before they take the field after four seasons of mediocrity and failure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's because davethepanther has to angrily respond to everybody who doesn't conform to his opinion that the panthers are an elite team before they take the field after four seasons of mediocrity and failure

 

No it is because a writer writes about playing a team that beat them twice the year before as a positive instead of a negative.  But then again you didn't read the article.

 

You have NEVER heard me call our team ELITE.  I believe as many on this forum do. The Panthers can be.  Sorry I don't conform to your continual cloudy dreary outlook for our my team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was very intrigued by him early on. The tape (highlights) look good, and at that size still seemed to have pull away speed. Then I looked into him more, and he has some very bad fumbling issues. If I am remembering right it is like once in every 34 carries on average.  Near the bottom in the entire RB draft class.
    • Honestly I claim no expertise regarding the draft and haven't gone to the trouble of creating a board or ranking players. But I think that guys in the top 50 are often from bigger schools and get more hype than other guys.  Plus there may be guys taken at some positions much sooner or later than previous years. In the past 2 drafts, no tight ends were drafted in the first round. And the last time 4 TEs were picked in the top 3 rounds was a decade ago. This year we could see 2 tight ends taken in the first round alone and another 2 or 3 in the second round.  On the other hand there is often a run of OTs taken in the first and this might be the first draft in a while where no OTs are taken in the top 20. We could get one of the top 10 tackles at 98 or 115 where other years they would be chosen much higher. Is that because they all suck or is it that there are more attractive guys at other positions?  You make a good point about trading up. Is it better to have 2 picks at 40 and 64 instead of one at 24. I think it depends on how we see our current projected starters.  If we think we have several holes to fill and these guys are going to be impact players than don't trade up. If you think that the guy at 64 would be a rotational guy but who we want at 24 is going to be a starter and really impact the team, you trade up. It depends on what we think we need and how the draft pans out.