Made him look like a rock star. Pathetic.
Jump to content
Posted 17 July 2013 - 07:35 AM
The only saving grace is that Rolling Stone hasn't been relevant since they let Tom Wolf pretend he was Charles Dickens back in '84.
But yes you are correct that while the story may have merit the image of a terrorist on their cover shouldn't be vaguely reminiscent of a Jim Morrison image.
Posted 17 July 2013 - 07:38 AM
Posted 17 July 2013 - 08:15 AM
Posted 17 July 2013 - 10:02 AM
I usually don't get too upset about things that tick off a large number of people, I just pop the popcorn and watch the show, but I just don't understand the point of giving this guy the cover or any kind of publicity. Who thought this was a good idea? I mean, I guess if it gets everyone talking about the magazine which doesn't seem vastly popular anymore, that's a win, but I'm just not sure.
Posted 17 July 2013 - 11:17 AM
and now a passé magazine creams LOOK AT ME!!!! Sadly their circulation #s will probably go up.
Posted 17 July 2013 - 11:32 AM
I stopped being shocked at Rolling Stone covers when they put this creature on there:
Posted 17 July 2013 - 11:35 AM
I looked at the Grateful Dead tribute edition they put out last month.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users