Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Virginia Isn't for Lovers Anymore


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,380
  • Reputation: 2,008
  • LocationAlaska
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 01:31 AM

 

Ken Cuccinelli wants to keep kids safe from sexual predators by banning oral and anal sex—between consenting adults. On a website his campaign just launched, Cuccinelli, the Republican candidate for governor in Virginia, paints himself as the only real protector of children, because of his efforts as Virginia attorney general to reinstate a law banning all naked fun-time acts besides vaginal intercourse. 

 

Cuccinelli's claim is that only by reinstating the Crimes Against Nature law, which Cuccinelli dishonestly calls the "Anti-Child Predators Law," can the state of Virginia prosecute people who rape children. Never mind that rape is already illegal, child molestation is already illegal, and statutory rape is already illegal. His website says that a full 90 sexual predators may come off the sex offenders registry (the site is vague on how) if oral and anal sex isn't banned outright for everyone, a claim that hopefully will remind voters that enforcing such a law would mean that adults having consensual sex in their bedrooms could become "sex offenders" if they're caught. 

 

Oral sex is almost universal among sexually active adults. The Centers for Disease Control finds that nearly 82 percent of men and 80 percent of women ages 15-44 admit to having had it. The Kinsey Institute's research shows that nearly everyone who is having vaginal intercourse also admits to having oral sex. The very few who don't cop to this no doubt want to keep their jobs working for the Cuccinelli campaign.

 

 

http://www.slate.com...a_wants_to.html

 

 

 



#2 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,711
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 03:04 AM

TIL that banning blowjobs will make Chester look for a cougar.

#3 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,951
  • Reputation: 18,391
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:02 AM

the religious right is out of its goddamn mind.



#4 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 11,680
  • Reputation: 5,069
  • LocationChapel Hill
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:07 AM

i really hope the first syllable of that guy's last name is pronounced like "cooch"



#5 catfang

catfang

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,795
  • Reputation: 1,466
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:10 AM

I'll take what's wrong with the Republican party for $1,000, Alex.



#6 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    I Don't Want To Get Off On A Rant Here But....

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 18,915
  • Reputation: 4,239
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:18 AM

What does a quality BJ from your wife have to do with sexual predators?



#7 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,416
  • Reputation: 1,707
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:24 AM

the religious right is out of its goddamn mind.

they can't get sex of their minds 

 

 

 

repressed



#8 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,416
  • Reputation: 1,707
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 09:55 AM

although i did go to the website of this VA pub and:

 

 

  • This case is about using current law to protect a minor girl from a 47 year-old repeat sexual predator. The law is only applied to sodomy committed against minors, against non-consenting adults, or in public. In fact, contrary to misinformation peddled by Terry McAuliffe and his liberal allies against the defenders of this law, the law is not – and cannot be – used against consenting adults acting in private.

 



#9 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 24,416
  • Reputation: 2,348
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 10:02 AM

Did he explain how it can't be used in that way?



#10 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 19 July 2013 - 10:02 AM

 

although i did go to the website of this VA pub and:

 

 

  • This case is about using current law to protect a minor girl from a 47 year-old repeat sexual predator. The law is only applied to sodomy committed against minors, against non-consenting adults, or in public. In fact, contrary to misinformation peddled by Terry McAuliffe and his liberal allies against the defenders of this law, the law is not – and cannot be – used against consenting adults acting in private.

 

 

Last minute liberals lies in hopes to get McAuliffe elected.

 

What a joke. 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users