Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

More fuel to the fire: Juror says Zimmerman got away with murder


  • Please log in to reply
106 replies to this topic

#61 twylyght

twylyght

    The picture of how I care

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,492 posts

Posted 03 August 2013 - 03:12 AM

by following a kid, for no apparent reason. he assumed he was up to something, but you right, he probably would have followed a kid that looked like Justin beiber around as well.

 

So, in your mind, there is NO CONCEIVABLE way that it could be that Trayvon was scoping houses and GZ caught him in the act?  Or maybe that GZ was frustrated with all the break-ins for his neighborhood and was tired of waiting on the cops to not respond, yet again?



#62 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,118 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 03 August 2013 - 11:54 AM

So, in your mind, there is NO CONCEIVABLE way that it could be that Trayvon was scoping houses and GZ caught him in the act? Or maybe that GZ was frustrated with all the break-ins for his neighborhood and was tired of waiting on the cops to not respond, yet again?


There is no proof whatsoever that Martin was "scoping houses", or doing anything other than walking down the street. Also, none of the things you listed give Zimmerman a right to act like he's a police officer or a vigilante.

#63 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,644 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 03 August 2013 - 12:12 PM

do you think Martin would have attacked GZ if GZ were black?

 

would you not go into defensive mode if some random man was following you? and yes i do, because some random guy is stalking you.

 



#64 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,644 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 03 August 2013 - 12:16 PM

So, in your mind, there is NO CONCEIVABLE way that it could be that Trayvon was scoping houses and GZ caught him in the act?  Or maybe that GZ was frustrated with all the break-ins for his neighborhood and was tired of waiting on the cops to not respond, yet again?

 

so since the cops didnt show up, he decided to go all out and follow an unarmed kid to the point that the kid felt threaten and hoped on his ass. again he profiled Trayvon as a thug, or somebody that is up to no good, like you did. but why?
 



#65 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,317 posts

Posted 03 August 2013 - 01:46 PM

There is no proof whatsoever that Martin was "scoping houses", or doing anything other than walking down the street.

 

um excuse me but didn't you see those very scary pictures of martin? i'd say that's proof enough



#66 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,763 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 03 August 2013 - 02:21 PM

If you were being beat down, on the losing end of a fight, and you had a gun/equalizer, you'd use it to your advantage.

Anybody who says differently is lying.

This has nothing to do with race.

People are fuging idiots.

#67 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,118 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 03 August 2013 - 02:24 PM

If you were being beat down, on the losing end of a fight, and you had a gun/equalizer, you'd use it to your advantage.

Anybody who says differently is lying.

This has nothing to do with race.

People are fuging idiots.


You mean the losing end of a fight that you instigated by stalking someone? That's called murder.

#68 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,763 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 03 August 2013 - 03:23 PM

You mean the losing end of a fight that you instigated by stalking someone? That's called murder.

it's not against the law to follow and observe someone you feel is up to no good.

Zimmerman didn't jump the kid. The kid jumped him. It's called self defense.

#69 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,118 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 03 August 2013 - 03:42 PM

it's not against the law to follow and observe someone you feel is up to no good.

Zimmerman didn't jump the kid. The kid jumped him. It's called self defense.


That's strange. I could have sworn there were no witness accounts of who started the fight.

You must have been there right?

#70 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,763 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 03 August 2013 - 04:22 PM

Keep diggin.

#71 GOOGLE RON PAUL

GOOGLE RON PAUL

    fleet-footed poster

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,317 posts

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:00 PM

it's a good thing zimmerman's injuries weren't actually consistent with a "beat down" at all

 

i wonder how many of you goofy fugs who breathlessly defend noted child killer george zimmerman have ever actually been in a fight



#72 SuperMan

SuperMan

    I'm always holding back.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,265 posts
  • LocationRaleigh,NC

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:08 PM

You mean the losing end of a fight that you instigated by stalking someone? That's called murder.


By definition stalking is only if you follow someone more than one time legally he wasnt "stalking" him if he had followed him two days in a row that would have been stalking.

#73 CarolinaCoolin

CarolinaCoolin

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,598 posts
  • LocationMaryland

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:31 PM

By definition stalking is only if you follow someone more than one time legally he wasnt "stalking" him if he had followed him two days in a row that would have been stalking.


Shhhh don't use facts. He doesn't like it when you use facts to disrupt the narrative he's trying to sell.

#74 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,139 posts

Posted 03 August 2013 - 09:22 PM

Yeah Richard Ramirez didn't follow people for 2 days, so he shouldn't be called the Night Stalker, he should be the Night Innocent.



#75 SuperMan

SuperMan

    I'm always holding back.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,265 posts
  • LocationRaleigh,NC

Posted 03 August 2013 - 11:15 PM

Yeah Richard Ramirez didn't follow people for 2 days, so he shouldn't be called the Night Stalker, he should be the Night Innocent.


Right because the term the media gives a serial killer defiantly has so much to do with the legal definition of stalking he also set out with the intention to kill his victims something Zimmerman almost certainly did not.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com