Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Ruff

Ruff's 7-28 Camp Observations

52 posts in this topic

Still quite a log jam at the position...going to be hard to get him reps if all are healthy.

I think he may fit what we were doing better than any.....if he transitions to next level

 

if stewart isn't rushed back and williams starts the season slow like he traditionally has, barner could see more reps than people think. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if stewart isn't rushed back and williams starts the season slow like he traditionally has, barner could see more reps than people think.

Poole should make the roster as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poole should make the roster as well

 

unfortunately for poole, barner is already higher on the totem pole than he is.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if stewart isn't rushed back and williams starts the season slow like he traditionally has, barner could see more reps than people think.

Well....

Williams and Barner I think represent 2 guys that fit 2 different things. We haven't been lining up RBs behind a FB playing smash mouth....and that is Williams. He is patient and really thrives with a good lead block. Barner more of a spread back who just hits his hole.

Williams would fit more of what Shula did in Tampa. Barner would fit more of what Chud had been doing.

Williams is a good RB in the schemes Fox had. I don't expect to see him consistently excel again unless we get back to that....and with Cam

I don't want it. Even though he finished the last game going ham on NO.....he was equally unimpressive right up to that game.

Barner pass protection will determine if Barner gets real chances in my opinion. He likely already would be the most dangerous runner and receiver from those shotgun spread looks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We kept only 3 backs on the roster last season. I see 4 making the team Dlo, Stew, Tolbert and Barner. I dont see a way another makes the 53, barring injury.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We kept only 3 backs on the roster last season. I see 4 making the team Dlo, Stew, Tolbert and Barner. I dont see a way another makes the 53, barring injury.

I guess if Stewart starts the year PUP....that would be a huge opportunity for one RB to get a shot that normally wouldn't

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess if Stewart starts the year PUP....that would be a huge opportunity for one RB to get a shot that normally wouldn't

That's a definite possibility. Then said player would be waived upon Stewarts return. My moneys on Stewie being ready game one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How was David Gettis? If you go down there tomorrow can you tell me how he is looking? Also who will win the opposite side corner? I really like Josh Thomas in that spot, but who is it looking to be?

 

Josh played physical today, no doubt about it. But, I think the opposite corner job belongs to Captain until further notice. David Gettis also looked good. Even Rivera said he's had a good start to training camp, but he did get shaken up on a long incompletion down the sideline. He eventually came back and finished with the receivers, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still quite a log jam at the position...going to be hard to get him reps if all are healthy.

I think he may fit what we were doing better than any.....if he transitions to next level

I'm not sure it will be a matter of getting a lot of snaps. i think he'll end up with significantly less than williams, stewart, and even cam. i just think his skill set and the situations will be able to translate into big yardage plays and if it's anywhere near the red zone he could wind up easily breaking off into the end zone. his touches will likely be limited, but his yards per touch won't  be.

 

btw, i think he'll translate just fine into the pros. i don't see him as being much as a blocker, but i also don't think you expect him to be. he's a big play weapon. that's all.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined