Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Star - Rookie Power Rankings Week 2

Carolina Panthers

  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

#1 Admiral Ackbar

Admiral Ackbar

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 200 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 16 August 2013 - 10:44 PM

So far this preseason Bleacher report has created weekly "power rankings" for all NFL rookies. This weeks they have Star ranked 22nd (out of 25), which is 14 spots lower than he was the week before.

 

This is basically what they stated about him:

 

  • They call Star a "human bulldozer" giving him a 16.4/20 on a college tape measuring scale, but then give him a 5.4/10 on strength saying " his functional strength and dominance do not show up on test numbers (i.e Combine).

 

  • The columnist goes on saying that he is a great fit for Carolina and well get an early opportunity (stuff we already should know).

 

  • Then after talking about how he has received high praise from Ron Rivera in TC, the article goes on to say that in his game one performance he had an uneventful night and was moved easily by Eben Britton, rankings were a 2.5/5.

They give Star an overall ranking of 36.4/50 for the week. I haven't really watched Star a lot this preseason mainly b/c we know what your going to get from him, which is clogging up the hole.

 

So do you guys think this is an accurate ranking of Star? Do you think his stock has fallen or risen in the Eagles game? Are you impressed with Star at this point? (even though its early)

 

Other rookie's of interest where: Desmond Trufant (24th) Manti Te'o (16th) Geno Smith (13th) EJ Manuel (4th)

 

Link: http://bleacherrepor...-week-2/page/28

 



#2 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,345 posts

Posted 16 August 2013 - 10:50 PM

It's Bleacher Report. 

 

No significant worries here.



#3 The Huddler

The Huddler

    St. Thomas Aquinas

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,038 posts
  • LocationRadford University

Posted 16 August 2013 - 10:59 PM

Fug bleacher report

#4 Montie_0123

Montie_0123

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 728 posts
  • LocationCharlotte NC

Posted 16 August 2013 - 11:18 PM

Yea I can care less what they think I've seen what he can do during the game and he's living up to what I thought.

#5 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 14,277 posts

Posted 16 August 2013 - 11:33 PM

Seems legit.

#6 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,260 posts
  • LocationSouth Florida

Posted 17 August 2013 - 12:14 AM

RIght there... Manti Te'o at 16th. That's where they lose creditability (other than... you know... them being Bleacher Report). Te'o had a ghost night in his debut, and couldn't play this week. How exactly is he 'ranked' higher than Star again?



#7 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 14,277 posts

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:20 AM

Same reason a guy can drop 14 spots in one week and have an arbitrary rating which isn't derived from any solid metric or measurable assigned to him on aspects of his game.

#8 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,260 posts
  • LocationSouth Florida

Posted 17 August 2013 - 01:36 AM

The author's grading scale is derived from a chimp he hired to do his statistics homework.

Starlite hasn't been dominant but no one should be expecting him to be a monster in his rookie campaign. Lotulelei has flashed his potential in these two preseason games but he's going to experience some growing pains, especially at his position.

#9 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,106 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 17 August 2013 - 08:28 AM

How many rookie nose tackles excel right out of the chute who aren't named Suh?



#10 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • MFCEO
  • 19,701 posts

Posted 17 August 2013 - 08:41 AM

You realize that linking to a bleacher report article is almost as legitimate as linking to a tinderbox thread, right?

#11 Jesse

Jesse

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,213 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 17 August 2013 - 08:52 AM

Really, gonna post that BR BS?

#12 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,374 posts

Posted 17 August 2013 - 09:42 AM

Most of the comments here about Star have been that he has not looked that good. Is this just one of those defensive reactions because it's someone from the outside saying it?



#13 89 Bottom Line

89 Bottom Line

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 108 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 17 August 2013 - 09:50 AM

Bleacher report is the Special Olympics of sports writing.



#14 AceBoogie

AceBoogie

    LiveStrong

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,766 posts

Posted 17 August 2013 - 10:05 AM

Most of the comments here about Star have been that he has not looked that good. Is this just one of those defensive reactions because it's someone from the outside saying it?


Yes

#15 Not Carlos Danger

Not Carlos Danger

    Cold Ass Honky

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,334 posts

Posted 17 August 2013 - 10:33 AM

If it weren't for the Internet, Bleacher Report would be written in crayon.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Carolina Panthers

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.