Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Hardy wants to get paid.


  • Please log in to reply
160 replies to this topic

#46 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • MFCEO
  • 20,084 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:40 AM

I get what stirs is saying.

 

I don't think it is likely that Cam is not signed long-term.  But, if he is still having the "same" accuracy issues and the team is not winning two years from now, Gettleman WILL have to decide if he is the answer.

 

Bingo.

 

If Gettleman thinks we can win a Superbowl with an amazing defense and game manager QB, that is his call. Its been done before. Paying Cam a record breaking contract and not being able to then afford a good defense or even any offensive weapons around him may not be enticing to Gettleman.



#47 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:43 AM

Bingo.

 

If Gettleman thinks we can win a Superbowl with an amazing defense and game manager QB, that is his call. Its been done before. Paying Cam a record breaking contract and not being able to then afford a good defense or even any offensive weapons around him may not be enticing to Gettleman.

 

he won't get paid a record-breaking contract if he has accuracy issues and isn't playing to his full potential. that is the whole point.



#48 CarolinaNCSU

CarolinaNCSU

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,889 posts
  • LocationRaleigh

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:43 AM

Our start to the season is really going to impact Hardy especially IMO.  If we start slow/start losing hope, I could see him being shopped (if Gettlemen believes we will have to part ways).

 

I think it was Kurb who mentioned once a contract that could be back-loaded where his big money hits as CJ's starts to ease up on the cap, and we could part ways with Johnson if need be. If possible, that situation could be ideal. Gettlemen will definitely need to work some magic in the upcoming years. 



#49 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:43 AM

Feel free to report it and one of our new mods can act on it.

 

naw i'm good.



#50 nosuchthingasapanther

nosuchthingasapanther

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,221 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:43 AM

@MrFerreira675@ItsGHardy I WANT" THE KRAKEN" IN OAKLAND NEXT YEAR.69 MIL IN CAP SPACE.LETS GET THIS BEAST ON OUR D.

Anyone catch the hardy retweet last night? I know I'm grasping at straws but, he's asking for Charles johnson type that we don't have. And it looks like he doesn't care where he gets it. I would suggest getting some value for him now while he's still got value.

 

this is the most important point in your post.

 

not saying hardy doesn't want to get paid, because he does...but hardy's been retweeting money tweets sent to him almost since day one. that along with anything else that strokes his mildly psychotic ego.

 

from a business standpoint...alexander, star, and, short have made the kraken almost expendable.



#51 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • MFCEO
  • 20,084 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:46 AM

he won't get paid a record-breaking contract if he has accuracy issues and isn't playing to his full potential. that is the whole point.

 

Not here he won't. But someone may offer it to him. Oakland comes to mind.



#52 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:49 AM

Not here he won't. But someone may offer it to him. Oakland comes to mind.

 

lol. if you think he'd even entertain going to oakland

 

flip it over what have we done for luke this offseason? gave him weapons to succeed by drafting big body DT's and surrounding him with talent and look what that did for him.

 

now we have a player of his caliber on the other side of the ball. but he hasn't been given the tools to succeed. Why can't we have what SF has? both offense and defense? you pay your stars and surround them



#53 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,519 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:49 AM

Bingo.

 

If Gettleman thinks we can win a Superbowl with an amazing defense and game manager QB, that is his call. Its been done before. Paying Cam a record breaking contract and not being able to then afford a good defense or even any offensive weapons around him may not be enticing to Gettleman.

 

can you win a super bowl in today's NFL with a game manager QB is a question. i dont think so, and i hope Gettleman doesnt either.



#54 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,565 posts
  • LocationShallotte, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:51 AM

can you win a super bowl in today's NFL with a game manager QB is a question. i dont think so, and i hope Gettleman doesnt either.

 

The Ravens did last year. 



#55 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • MFCEO
  • 20,084 posts

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:52 AM

lol. if you think he'd even entertain going to oakland

 

He would entertain going anywhere that paid him a record contract.



#56 Qu1million

Qu1million

    CantBeatMeInMadden!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 747 posts
  • LocationSouth Jersey

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:53 AM

lol. if you think he'd even entertain going to oakland

flip it over what have we done for luke this offseason? gave him weapons to succeed by drafting big body DT's and surrounding him with talent and look what that did for him.

now we have a player of his caliber on the other side of the ball. but he hasn't been given the tools to succeed. Why can't we have what SF has? both offense and defense? you pay your stars and surround them


San Fran didn't have the cap issues we have and it took them a long time to get where they are now

#57 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:56 AM

San Fran didn't have the cap issues we have and it took them a long time to get where they are now

 

we won't have cap issues shortly.
 



#58 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:57 AM

He would entertain going anywhere that paid him a record contract.

 

that's your opinion.

i think he wouldn't entertain going to a place where he can't win. we turn into a contender. watch what happens.
 



#59 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Administrators
  • 13,457 posts
  • LocationILM

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:58 AM

The Ravens did last year. 

 

Flacco was making it rain TD's in the playoffs. He was far far far from "game managing"



#60 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,294 posts
  • LocationAsheville, NC

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:58 AM

flacco was not game managing in the playoffs. smh.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.