Jump to content





Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

Would you like to see us move on from D Will and J- Stew?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
46 replies to this topic

Poll: Would you like to see us move on from D Will and J- Stew (101 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you like to see us move on from D Will and J- Stew

  1. Yes (61 votes [59.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 59.22%

  2. Voted No (42 votes [40.78%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 40.78%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#37 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,216
  • Reputation: 5,805
HUDDLER

Posted 27 August 2013 - 11:51 PM

This reminds me of the kill Kugbila and Gettleman for making the pick posts from earlier. People tend to forget Nelson, Duke Robinson, and a hosts of undrafted guys (Ziemba) that we have invested in that just have not panned out. Robinson was from a huge program and he was a bum. We have just missed, but the line we have now is better than the one that finished the season winning 5-6 games. You pay some guys and it doesn't work out. D-Will is still serviceable and Stew will contribute when he is healthy.


Well when you actually compare our investments in different positions on an even scale you can say it worked out just as well. As far as first round offensive linemen are concerned, okay Jeff Otah washed out worse than stewart or Williams ever did but Jordan Gross has more than made up for it and contributed more to this team than either one.

Compare Duke Robinson to Eric Shelton

#38 Lloyd Christmas

Lloyd Christmas

    So you're telling me there's a chance....

  • Joined: 11-July 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 556
  • Reputation: 303
HUDDLER

Posted 27 August 2013 - 11:58 PM

hLDrg.gif

 



#39 Guest_Spider Monkey_*

Guest_Spider Monkey_*
Guests

Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:08 AM

This thread has been recycled for 5 years.

#40 redbuddha

redbuddha

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 19-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,007
  • Reputation: 206
HUDDLER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 06:33 AM

Cam Newton is our leading rusher let them go as soon as possible, we could get the same production from Poole & Barner. For way less money. Everybody gets cut, traded, or retires someday... I was upset when the chargers let L. Tomlinson go, he went to the Jets and I saw why, he wasn't the same anymore.

But unless they are both better than they were in 2009; I don't know if this offense as it has been seen recently is suited for their game.

#41 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,020
  • Reputation: 2,376
HUDDLER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 07:02 AM

The collective foresight of the Huddle would get you to about next Thursday.

Only two years ago, there were massive e-orgasms about "Double Trouble" being together, blah, blah, blah.

I was the ire of the board for suggesting we not sign or trade at least one of them or both since we had drafted Cam and was going to change direction. The direction of the league had also changed making high price RB's a thing of the past.

And now we have a poll and the bulk of the Huddle wants to move on. Will now go eat my breakfast of vindication and toast.

#42 Snake

Snake

    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,952
  • Reputation: 1,373
HUDDLER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 07:42 AM

Honesty if we had that 50 mill to spend Barner and Poole could be two serviceable backs for this team. Its s passing league and we are still a passing team. Same goes for Beason next year Blackburn could step in and fill that role and cost half the price with little dropoff.

#43 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 48,199
  • Reputation: 15,697
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 09:22 AM

My worst case scenario would be seeing Williams traded to a team with a goog O-Line and watching him tear it up :(



#44 FootballMaestro

FootballMaestro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,933
  • Reputation: 1,581
HUDDLER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 11:00 AM

Cap Logic aside: I would prefer a D'Angelo, Tolbert and Barner combination. 

 

And if Barner, or any other RB pans out, then you can move on from D'Angelo. 



#45 FootballMaestro

FootballMaestro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 13-January 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,933
  • Reputation: 1,581
HUDDLER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 11:00 AM

Cap Logic aside: I would prefer a D'Angelo, Tolbert and Barner combination. 

 

And if Barner, or any other RB pans out, then you can move on from D'Angelo. 



#46 Jangler

Jangler

    oddly perched

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 49,614
  • Reputation: 10,090
HUDDLER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 12:46 PM

The collective foresight of the Huddle would get you to about next Thursday.

Only two years ago, there were massive e-orgasms about "Double Trouble" being together, blah, blah, blah.

I was the ire of the board for suggesting we not sign or trade at least one of them or both since we had drafted Cam and was going to change direction. The direction of the league had also changed making high price RB's a thing of the past.

And now we have a poll and the bulk of the Huddle wants to move on. Will now go eat my breakfast of vindication and toast.

 



#47 thefuzz

thefuzz

    coppin a feel

  • Joined: 12-December 08
  • posts: 9,358
  • Reputation: 1,523
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 August 2013 - 03:24 PM

Should have:

 

A: Not drafted either of them.

 

B: Not signed them to extensions.

 

C: Not paid two fuging RB's elite money on a shitty team.