Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Do The Post-Cut Positional Numbers Mean a Shift in Philosophy?

26 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Particularly the 5 WRs and 5 RBs... Do you think this means much more of a run-heavy style than we were even anticipating?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

It means we had more talent at one position over the other.

Keep the good, cut the bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Means we are going to pick up another WR.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

We have 5 RBs because of injuries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

No it means there was dead weight at certain positions that we used to fill depth at others.

Seems pretty simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I don't know, I keep thinking of Shula and his Tampa Bay offense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

i think  it means more that we have a weak OL so we've got to take up 10 or 11 spots there and we are going to be running nickel packages so we need more DBs.

 

i think also it means they might be trying to turn brandon williams into a bigger receiving option so we kept more TEs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I am sooooo drunk.  You're going to have to make this a, "Choose A or B" for me to give you anything.  Before you do, I choose B.

 

 

 

Now, back to being serious, we won't start the season with 5 WR's.  This is where the process begins, not ends.  Gettleman is no idiot.  He is scanning all there is to scan like Sauron in the Lord of the Rings.

 

 

Now, back to drinking and the Gettis thread....

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

My fear is we are going to see playcalls from the 60s. Then again after Smith and LaFell we just had some dudes like most years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Particularly the 5 WRs and 5 RBs... Do you think this means much more of a run-heavy style than we were even anticipating?


4 RBs

Williams
Tolbert
Barner
Smith

Stewart would be the 4th if off PUP and Smith gone
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

My fear is we are going to see playcalls from the 60s. Then again after Smith and LaFell we just had some dudes like most years.


Cam is still the QB....and Shula knows what he can do. He got Chud a HC gig. He is that awesome. Shula won't sit on that
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I agree but big difference between coaching Cam vs. the entire offense. Cam is not our offense he is our QB, regardless of his first two years, he'll have to play less a role in some areas for us to actually win some games.

 

I hope Shula can do it, just have to wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites