Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Proudiddy

Do The Post-Cut Positional Numbers Mean a Shift in Philosophy?

Recommended Posts





TheRed    17,989

No it means there was dead weight at certain positions that we used to fill depth at others.

Seems pretty simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rayzor    10,299

i think  it means more that we have a weak OL so we've got to take up 10 or 11 spots there and we are going to be running nickel packages so we need more DBs.

 

i think also it means they might be trying to turn brandon williams into a bigger receiving option so we kept more TEs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SIGCHI222    6,895

I am sooooo drunk.  You're going to have to make this a, "Choose A or B" for me to give you anything.  Before you do, I choose B.

 

 

 

Now, back to being serious, we won't start the season with 5 WR's.  This is where the process begins, not ends.  Gettleman is no idiot.  He is scanning all there is to scan like Sauron in the Lord of the Rings.

 

 

Now, back to drinking and the Gettis thread....

  • Pie 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Snake    4,070

My fear is we are going to see playcalls from the 60s. Then again after Smith and LaFell we just had some dudes like most years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CRA    12,167

Particularly the 5 WRs and 5 RBs... Do you think this means much more of a run-heavy style than we were even anticipating?

4 RBs

Williams

Tolbert

Barner

Smith

Stewart would be the 4th if off PUP and Smith gone

  • Pie 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CRA    12,167

My fear is we are going to see playcalls from the 60s. Then again after Smith and LaFell we just had some dudes like most years.

Cam is still the QB....and Shula knows what he can do. He got Chud a HC gig. He is that awesome. Shula won't sit on that

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lumps    1,644

I agree but big difference between coaching Cam vs. the entire offense. Cam is not our offense he is our QB, regardless of his first two years, he'll have to play less a role in some areas for us to actually win some games.

 

I hope Shula can do it, just have to wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proudiddy    9,509

4 RBs

Williams

Tolbert

Barner

Smith

Stewart would be the 4th if off PUP and Smith gone

My point being Stewart factored into the numbers whether he was active or not, so by keeping Smith, we technically kept 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
carpanfan96    1,458

Brockel mainly plays FB on GL blocking plays and such, so he basically counts as a FB since that's where they list him now position wise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jarhead    1,031

This party is not over ...we will see some moves soon I would imagine.I think we will see a couple of things...The first is back filling for special team value and the 2nd is upgrading our depth . I could see him bringing in maybe 1 or 2 starters at the most if the need and value are there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×