Montreal@Canes
#1
Posted 14 December 2008 - 03:21 PM
Powerplay was horrible 0 for 8 so I was happy just to get the point.
Another OT loss for Mo, but I'm happy losing close games in OT than not trying at all. Seidenburg, Gleason and Ward were back. All three looked back to their old selves.
I think we'll start to win some of the up and coming games starting with Tuesday.
Buy one get one free offer with donation to Toys for tots (*is that the correct charity?)
#3
Posted 15 December 2008 - 01:53 PM
Sure, we have a lot of defensive injuries, and this isn't the most talented team in the NHL, but Mo has them playing pretty well so far. They really impress me sometimes, and do a lot of things right, and other times, they do some things wrong that end up costing them. However, this team looks way better than it did earlier in the season.
If Cam Ward can stay in net, and we keep improving, I feel like we have a chance to win any game that comes our way. If we can improve our Power Play, this team's record will get better fast.
#4
Posted 16 December 2008 - 05:20 PM
#5
Posted 16 December 2008 - 07:41 PM
Man, this team has been playing better as of late. I don't know if they just needed a change or what, but under Mo this team is doing a lot of things right.
Sure, we have a lot of defensive injuries, and this isn't the most talented team in the NHL, but Mo has them playing pretty well so far. They really impress me sometimes, and do a lot of things right, and other times, they do some things wrong that end up costing them. However, this team looks way better than it did earlier in the season.
If Cam Ward can stay in net, and we keep improving, I feel like we have a chance to win any game that comes our way. If we can improve our Power Play, this team's record will get better fast.
I don't know if I would really call 1-1-3 record "better". Sure, we aren't losing that much...but we aren't winning either. Not to mention the blown leads and poor play as the game moves along.
Good start tonight though. Eric Staal has two goals in the first for a 2-0 lead.
#6
Posted 16 December 2008 - 09:04 PM
The Canes should be up by at least a few goals, as Montreal has served 22 penalty minutes (all were the two minute variety), compared to only two minutes for the Canes.
#7
Posted 16 December 2008 - 09:32 PM
3-2 at the end of the two. The third will begin with a 5-3 advantage for Carolina.
The Canes should be up by at least a few goals, as Montreal has served 22 penalty minutes (all were the two minute variety), compared to only two minutes for the Canes.
22-2 sounds a little fishy to me!
#8
Posted 17 December 2008 - 08:19 AM
#9
Posted 17 December 2008 - 10:48 AM
#10
Posted 17 December 2008 - 11:18 AM
#11
Posted 17 December 2008 - 11:59 AM
22-2 sounds a little fishy to me!
Yeah, it's that Carolina bias that the refs have for the Canes
A nice win, even though it shouldn't have been that close given the penalty situation.
#12
Posted 20 December 2008 - 11:23 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





