Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

First win after a Cam INT

43 posts in this topic

Posted

Anyone knows when a franchise hits the third win with a new QB after he throws an interception it is lights out from then on.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

First games when the season still matters anyway.

 

Gotta admit, Cam's matured a lot, he doesn't seem to let the turnovers get to him as much.

 

When your defense is gaining yardage by stuffing the other team for negative gains, there is no reason to get flustered.  Cam played better, but the defense won this game.  In my opinion, Cam needs to get better.  I am pretty sure most people measure Cam's maturity when the chips are down, not when we are winning, but I see your point.  He came back.

 

The thing I liked about Cam's performance the most?  He found Lafelll and Ginn.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm pretty sure we would win a game when Cam throws 4 picks as long as the defense posts a shutout.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm pretty sure we would win a game when Cam throws 4 picks as long as the defense posts a shutout.

 

Not necessarily... Could just be a tie :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Cam played better, but the defense won this game. 

 

Meh.

 

The offense helped the defense out with multiple scoring drives, many of them long and demoralizing to the Giants.

 

You'd have a point if the offense hadn't score like, 38 points.  But meh.  This was a full team effort and I dislike any attempt to claim one side of the ball or the other "won" the game, because when you hang 38 on a team your offense is balling, and when you shut out a team, your defense is balling, so when you dismantle a team the way we did, let's just give credit to both of the units equally and say the team won this game.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Meh.

 

The offense helped the defense out with multiple scoring drives, many of them long and demoralizing to the Giants.

 

You'd have a point if the offense hadn't score like, 38 points.  But meh.  This was a full team effort and I dislike any attempt to claim one side of the ball or the other "won" the game, because when you hang 38 on a team your offense is balling, and when you shut out a team, your defense is balling, so when you dismantle a team the way we did, let's just give credit to both of the units equally and say the team won this game.

 

Agreed. Though I'm not terribly surprised MHS isn't willing to give the offense much credit. He's gone out of his way to not even bring up or revisit all the silliness he passionately typed about Cam leading up to the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Meh.

 

The offense helped the defense out with multiple scoring drives, many of them long and demoralizing to the Giants.

 

You'd have a point if the offense hadn't score like, 38 points.  But meh.  This was a full team effort and I dislike any attempt to claim one side of the ball or the other "won" the game, because when you hang 38 on a team your offense is balling, and when you shut out a team, your defense is balling, so when you dismantle a team the way we did, let's just give credit to both of the units equally and say the team won this game.

How many points did the offense have to score to win the game?  Did the defense create points off turnovers?  If the created more than 1, then they won the game.   If the offense did not need to score 38 points, then the offense did not win the game by scoring 38;   While the 38 points was impressive, it did not win the game--the defense did.  The reason the offense scored 38 was due to the defense giving them multiple chances and field position.  Any person of average intelligence knows that.

 

If a baseball team scores 10 runs but their pitcher throws a no-hitter, are you going to credit the offense for winning the game?  You are just trolling.

Anyone who types Meh in a response is a dxxx anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Agreed. Though I'm not terribly surprised MHS isn't willing to give the offense much credit. He's gone out of his way to not even bring up or revisit all the silliness he passionately typed about Cam leading up to the game.

 

Red, you are clueless, and if you ever agreed with a point I made, it would embarrass me to a point where I would re-examine my position.

 

Anyone who does not think the defense won the game is probably accustomed to missing obvious points in other aspects of their lives, so I am not going to explain the simple logic to someone who lacks the ability to grasp it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How many points did the offense have to score to win the game? Did the defense create points off turnovers? If the created more than 1, then they won the game. If the offense did not need to score 38 points, then the offense did not win the game by scoring 38; While the 38 points was impressive, it did not win the game--the defense did. The reason the offense scored 38 was due to the defense giving them multiple chances and field position. Any person of average intelligence knows that.

If a baseball team scores 10 runs but their pitcher throws a no-hitter, are you going to credit the offense for winning the game? You are just trolling.

Anyone who types Meh in a response is a dxxx anyway.

Scoring on 6 of our first 8 possessions always helps.

It was a team win. Why are we making it defense vs. offense?

Some of you guys are people that could get laid by the hottest girl at the bar but still be dissapointed because she had a freckle on her butt.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

How many points did the offense have to score to win the game? 

 

I'll stop you right there... It doesn't matter how many points the offense "had to score to win the game.  What matters is how many points the offense did score.

 

How many points did the defense need to give up so our offense could win?

 

Neither your question nor mine are related at all to what happened in reality, because if we start playing what ifs we have no idea how the game would have gone.

 

You can claim we'd have won with 2 3 or 10 but you have no fuging clue.  Know why?  If all those scoring drives stall in one way or another, you give the Giants more time, and more hope.  Who knows what happens in that case.  Just because the defense pitched a shutout in a blowout doesn't mean it would have pitched a shutout in a close game.  We have no way of knowing.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Red, you are clueless, and if you ever agreed with a point I made, it would embarrass me to a point where I would re-examine my position.

Anyone who does not think the defense won the game is probably accustomed to missing obvious points in other aspects of their lives, so I am not going to explain the simple logic to someone who lacks the ability to grasp it.

Ah yes, instead of actually trying to man up and backup all that drivel you spewed, you resort to insults.

So not only are you a coward, you are a hypocrite. Dually noted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Scoring on 6 of our first 8 possessions always helps.

It was a team win. Why are we making it defense vs. offense?

Some of you guys are people that could get laid by the hottest girl at the bar but still be dissapointed because she had a freckle on her butt.

 

 There are certain people here who think it is there place to blast anyone who comes close to saying something critical of their favorite player.  Heck, the closest the Giants came to scoring was off a turnover--but the defense stuffed that.  I think our defense won that game in the first quarter.  The demoralized the Giants..  The rest was fluff.  They deserve credit for taking the Giants out early.  There is nothing wrong about thinking that, in fact, if you know football, you would have to agree.  It was lopsided and obvious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites