Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest Spider Monkey

ESPN is gonna be pissed if we keep winning...

101 posts in this topic

If we make the playoffs how will they discredit Cam having better numbers than their hero's?

Newton: 59% 675yd, 7td, 2 turnovers

Wilson: 64% 718yd, 6td, 3 turnovers

Lucky: 66% 763yd, 5td, 1 turnover

Colin: 56% 818yd, 4td, 4 turnovers

RGIII: 63% 1032yd, 5td, 7 turnovers

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does RGIII have 1000 yards already?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The media (as well as moth others) will use whatever metric that suits their agenda.

 

For Instance:

 

Newton has completed less than 60% and far fewer yards than Wilson, luck, kapernick,rg3.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does RGIII have 1000 yards already?

 

 

garbage time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does RGIII have 1000 yards already?

All of his turnovers are vs 1st team defenses.

All of his YD & TD are vs back-ups in garbage time.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's calm down about this playoff talk. Its one win. I love it and we have a good shot at it, but its a little early.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Panthro Proving Medical Malpractice Based on Diagnostic Errors The law does not hold doctors legally responsible for all diagnostic errors. Instead, patients usually must prove three things in order to prevail in a medical malpractice lawsuit based on a wrong diagnosis: A doctor-patient relationship existed. The doctor was negligent -- that is, did not provide treatment in a reasonably skillful and competent manner. The doctor's negligence caused actual injury to the patient. Most medical malpractice cases hinge on either the second or third element (or both) -- was the doctor negligent and did that negligence harm the patient?   Easily provable  1. ER dr saw mom and had all the records. Mom was healthy prior, no issues besides a murmur she was born with. 2. Motrin does dot fix the flu especially if you one has A and B. Greenville drs from ICU would testify against New Bern ER doc. No tamiflu prescribed nor any other treatment besides Motrin. (Anybody can take Tylenol/asprin but tamiflu is prescribed) 3. Without x raying or running further test, mom went from early caught flu to both pneumonia that now developed 3rd stage ARDS and now pulmonary fibrosis is setting in. Due this negligence, mom will live at most 5 years in poor quality will my dad ends bankrupt. I just proved how not properly treating mom has lead to a snowball effect due to incompetence which lead to where we are now. Dad was not given a course of action, he does not have a M.D. at the end of his name, and the hippocratic oath has been tarnished. I am in the settle or I will find out how he will lose his license. I will file a complaint with the hospital and board. Publish in the newspaper about his care and online. My mom will never be the same. 
    • Grigson put in a lot of effort to try and stack the receiving corps. Not all of it was smart effort, but it was effort. O-Line, on the other hand...