Jump to content





Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Play GM: A 4th Round pick in Week 5 or 6 for Hakeem Nicks? Would you guys take it?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
82 replies to this topic

#61 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,466
  • Reputation: 8,386
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:13 PM

and a T, and a G, and a CB, and a TE and possibly even a S. Not sure how many top WR's there are, but they usually go pretty quick.


Can't fix everything through one draft.

We could address several key positions in FA for half of what we would have to pay Nicks. It's not like we have the money and cap space to spend anyway with Hardy a soon to be FA, and Cam's contract coming up soon.

#62 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,277
  • Reputation: 479
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:16 PM

You offer a 5th...and negotiate to a 4th.

 

 



#63 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,965
  • Reputation: 716
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:37 PM

I'll be the first to say, I wouldn't do it. I really haven't been impressed with him. He had a few good games but the guy has some health issues. Also, I wouldn't trade for a guy who becomes a free agent at the end of the season. I would stay away from it.

 

Exactly. If he didn't get nipped by the injury bug so often, I'd lean more towards it.



#64 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,519
  • Reputation: 1,741
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 02:09 PM

Can't fix everything through one draft.

We could address several key positions in FA for half of what we would have to pay Nicks. It's not like we have the money and cap space to spend anyway with Hardy a soon to be FA, and Cam' contract coming up soon.

that's my point, i doubt we'd get one of the top 2 or 3 wr's unless we fail miserably this season.  for conversation sake, you take a proven super star for a 4th rounder.  the salary cap would be up for the GM to decide, which we wouldnt entertain the trade if we cant afford him anyway.



#65 toldozer

toldozer

    finally someone fatter than Alice

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,176
  • Reputation: 1,638
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 05:04 PM

hard to argue about the injuries and Nicks. However, with Gordon he is a failed drug test away from being suspended indef


Absolutely, but of we are giving up picks id rather get someone who has off field issues instead of issues staying on the field. What good has an injury prone hixon done us, what good did an injury prone gettis do us. Gordon is a special talent, id like to think guys on this team could keep him straight.

#66 FattyFatFat

FattyFatFat

    Buddhist Monk

  • Joined: 29-July 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,837
  • Reputation: 798
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 05:07 PM

Yup .

Id see what chic wants for Gordon.

#67 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,313
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 05:19 PM

Bring him home

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app



#68 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,466
  • Reputation: 8,386
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 05:24 PM

that's my point, i doubt we'd get one of the top 2 or 3 wr's unless we fail miserably this season.  for conversation sake, you take a proven super star for a 4th rounder.  the salary cap would be up for the GM to decide, which we wouldnt entertain the trade if we cant afford him anyway.

 

I just don't think he is worth a big contract and a draft pick. I think that decision would have a very high probability of backfiring on us. Not to mention hampering our ability to sign adequate players in other areas of need too.



#69 Coug Girl

Coug Girl

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 26-August 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 840
  • Reputation: 158
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 05:32 PM

Well Chud apparently told Gordon, they have no intentions of trading him. It's not totally Chud's decision, but there that is. 

 

http://www.nfl.com/n...-wont-be-traded

 

I don't really care for Nicks, since all the injuries. But, if he's at a good price then sure bring him over. I'm sure being a Giant, Gettleman has contemplated it given his affiliation with the franchise. I still want at least one WR out of the draft though. 



#70 panthers90

panthers90

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 22-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,275
  • Reputation: 496
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 07:04 PM

too bad we couldnt do Beason straight up for Nicksy

Or could we...



#71 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 07:09 PM

send em lafell and armani.



#72 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
HUDDLER

Posted 25 September 2013 - 07:09 PM

I just don't think he is worth a big contract and a draft pick. I think that decision would have a very high probability of backfiring on us. Not to mention hampering our ability to sign adequate players in other areas of need too.

But this is how we keep pounding