Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ARSEN

Call of Duty: Ghost

17 posts in this topic

Oh poo, you mean to tell me they added BIRDS?!!? And the trees move more realistic?!  AND A fuging DOG?!

 

AND you can blow poo up?  Daaaaamn, COD stepping their poo up.  Insta pre-order!

 

 

But seriously, fug Call of Duty.  Hate to sound like "that guy" but Battlefield makes this poo look like it's retarded step-brother.  The last real good one was COD4 (and it was awesome when it came out), starting with the 2nd Modern Warfare it just became shameless cash grab after shameless cash grab.  I have no idea why the fug people support this crap every year and it sells the way it does... completely saturates the entire gaming industry.  I'm sooo glad GTAV completely curb stomped Black Ops II's sales record.

 

It's like the gaming equivalent of Justin Bieber.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I enjoyed the MW trilogy, and Ghosts does look pretty good. I probably won't get it right off the bat though, there's so much due to hit this year and I've haven't even gotten around to the new Splinter Cell this year. Huge gaming year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blasts COD for being the same damn thing.

Praises BF4 despite being the same damn thing as BF3 (which was total poo.)

Typical Huddle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call of Duty United Offensive for the pc is the last COD game that I have played for more than 6 months. I like the single player campaigns in the MW and BO series but the mp sucks balls about as much as BWood does

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if that was directed at me, but I never said Battlefield wasn't the same thing, I mean there's only so much you can do in the FPS war genre (which Battlefield 3 was a huge upgrade to Bad Company 2, or more specifically, Battlefield 2 but okay whatever) I said it blows Call of Duty out the water.  More specifically, I said it makes CoD look like its retarded step-brother.

 

I understand some people may not like Battlefield because of how huge it is sometimes (though there are smaller maps and deathmatch modes... you can ignore all the huge poo altogether) lol but if you don't see how much of an upgrade and further along it is than CoD, especially the last two CoDs since BF3 came out... then I don't really know what to say.

 

Activision has been running the same damn engine with the same character models just (sometimes) slightly updating the overlays and not even the slightest gameplay enhancements since 2007.  fuging 2007.  But hey, you get 3 new maps (and for whatever reason lose the old ones just so they can re-add them later and recharge you for them) and a few new guns which are a carbon copy of the ones from the last game, just a different name so it's a $60 well spent I guess.  

 

That is nothing but cheap business, it's sorry business practice.  My bad for blasting them and telling it like it is, but poo like that kills the market as a whole, next thing you know everyone wants to be the next Call of Duty and you get the same wool over the eyes repetitive poo.  Rinse and repeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if that was directed at me, but I never said Battlefield wasn't the same thing, I mean there's only so much you can do in the FPS war genre (which Battlefield 3 was a huge upgrade to Bad Company 2, or more specifically, Battlefield 2 but okay whatever) I said it blows Call of Duty out the water. More specifically, I said it makes CoD look like its retarded step-brother.

I understand some people may not like Battlefield because of how huge it is sometimes (though there are smaller maps and deathmatch modes... you can ignore all the huge poo altogether) lol but if you don't see how much of an upgrade and further along it is than CoD, especially the last two CoDs since BF3 came out... then I don't really know what to say.

Activision has been running the same damn engine with the same character models just (sometimes) slightly updating the overlays and not even the slightest gameplay enhancements since 2007. fuging 2007. But hey, you get 3 new maps (and for whatever reason lose the old ones just so they can re-add them later and recharge you for them) and a few new guns which are a carbon copy of the ones from the last game, just a different name so it's a $60 well spent I guess.

That is nothing but cheap business, it's sorry business practice. My bad for blasting them and telling it like it is, but poo like that kills the market as a whole, next thing you know everyone wants to be the next Call of Duty and you get the same wool over the eyes repetitive poo. Rinse and repeat.

you really can't compare the two. they're each based around entirely different game play mechanics. only similarity is they're both war FPS games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Posts

    • I'm somewhat concerned over Cam's shoulder - but the LB group really has me worried. Luke's concussion really has me freaked out still... and I pray that TD's ACL continues to be strong.
    • The best part about trying to discuss racism or privelege with people is how when you mention these terms they immediately go to "I've worked for everything I ever had, nothing was ever handed to me", demonstrating that they don't understand what privelege is and how it's not an accusation. And instead of listening to what you say, they're in defensive mode and spend the entire argument denying that they are racist, dominate the conversation, and don't learn anything, and you never even accused them of being a racist to begin with. It's exhausting.
    • The KB hate is ridiculous. Blaming him for hogging targets that should have gone to Ginn? First of all, Ginn had more receptions and yards in 2016 than 2015. Sure he went down in TDs, but I'd expect KB to always have more TDs. Second, how do people forget that in his first game back from ACL that he was our best offensive weapon against the vaunted Denver D? We scored 20 (should have been 23) points against Denver with KB and 10 in the SB without and our offense was actually -5 based on turnovers.

      It gets tiring to see the revisionist history trying to blame KB for our offensive drop because he was a target hog.

      I'll throw out that if KB played in the SB we would have won. In 3 games against Denver Cotchery and Ginn had 7 receptions for 96 yards and caused an INT/muffed a huge pass before the step sack for a TD, regardless of replay officials. In 1 game against Denver KB had 6 receptions for 91 yards and a TD.


      Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle