Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Montsta

Forbes response to my letter re: Chris Smith article

79 posts in this topic

The professionalism is strong with this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

link to you original e-mail?  i can't find it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope to one day be known as the man that crushed Forbes. That'd be tight. I was honestly amazed to get such an unprofessional response.

 

where's the letter that u sent to him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, so you get mad that someone "told on Cam", and you turn into a baby and write them a letter, then get mad when they fire an equally pathetic response to it? 

 

Get a life.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

where's the letter that u sent to him?

A little blurb written by one of your writers, a Mr. Chris Smith (@ChrisSmith813), has gotten some press around national circles the past week or so, making it to sites such as Yahoo's Shutdown Corner blog, MSN's sports site and even ESPN.com. It's an article about how Cam Newton has been violating the NFL's uniform policy since his first game because he wears helmet visor clips with an Under Armour logo on them. He specifically mentioned in his initial article that after hours of research he could not find a single other player that has branded clips that would be in violation of the rule against non-approved brands being worn exposed on any part of a player's uniform. This article made it to a football fan site, and after literally two minutes of Google research, a minimum of ten other players, including superstars such as Robert Griffin III and Calvin Johnson, Raiders quarterback Terrell Pryor, and San Francisco safety Eric Reid were all also found to be wearing similar visor clips, and thusly, were also in violation. The author of this article would later edit his article to include a couple of lesser known names to the list, but not before he actually called the NFL league office to complain about Cam Newton specifically. This call will certainly result in an inflated fine for Cam Newton, potentially equal to the yearly salary of an average American. That is no small amount of money to lose on something so absurd. He claimed on twitter to have wrote it because it's wrong that Nike pays $1B+ for apparel rights in the NFL and Cam Newton is skirting that agreement with wanton disregard to the rules, and yet he did ZERO research to see if it was a rampant, league-wide problem.

What Mr. Smith doesn't mention in his piece is that he lives in New York and is a New York Giants fan and he wrote the article after the Carolina Panthers beat the Giants 38-0 this past Sunday. The timing of the piece, to me at least, seems a bit off at minimum, and at worst is wholly vindictive in it's premise.

Now that this has made it's way to the national sporting news outlets like the sites I mentioned above, I encourage you to peruse the comments section of those sites and make note of the reader responses.

"This is the kind of hard-nosed investigative journalism Forbes has it's writers looking into these days? What a joke." -Yahoo's Shutdown Corner Blog

"I can't believe Forbes employs this bitter fan to pass off things like this as 'news' articles." -MSN sports page

Those are just a couple of excerpts from the thousands of comments on these sites from people who just watched the credibility of anything related to the Forbes name take a serious hit.

As a lifelong fan of Forbes magazine and, in the more modern era, Forbes.com, I encourage you to take a long look at the people you allow to be associated with the Forbes name, because with a few clicks of the keyboard, they can completely tarnish an entire brand.

Thank you for your time and consideration of this email.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, so you get mad that someone "told on Cam", and you turn into a baby and write them a letter, then get mad when they fire an equally pathetic response to it? 

 

Get a life.

 

charlie_murphy_slap-82652.gif

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as a felon for half my life and a formerly institutionalized violent offender, my natural instinct is to just beat the living poo out of people to resolve our differences. But seeing as I don't think we'll be meeting face to face anytime soon, and I'm quite proud of my 7 year no arrest streak, I had to go with the Internet version.

And color me shocked that Brooklyn bully had to put his controversial two cents in.

Get a life.

Be careful man. He's from Charlotte but lives in Brooklyn and cuffs his jeans.

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looked at both your posts, they didn't improve so I will pick this one. Cherrypicking a stat or six game period that was decent hardly justifies that we were middle of the pack. First of all this discussion was about cornerbacks not defensive ends so your run defense and sack stats means little. Newsflash. We were top 10 in rush defense because teams didn't have to run on us when they could pick up chunks in passing the ball. We were 26th in number of rushing attempts by the opponent meaning 25 teams had the opponent rush more times than we did.  And we were second in sacks for the same reason. Teams passed all the time on us giving us many more times to sack them.  We had the 6th most passes thrown against us. We were second in sacks behind Arizona- 47   to their 48. But they had 547 attempts against them versus our 612. So we had a sack for every 13 attempts. Arizona had a sack every 11 attempts. Even Buffalo which ranked 9th in sacks with 39 had the same one sack for every 13 passes attempted as we did. Teams completed passes almost 70% of the time which also ranks us 29th. We were tied for 22nd with 4 other teams in giving up 7.5 yards per pass play.  We were 21st in yards surrendered in total defense. And in points surrendered we were 26th not 15th. That was offense not defense that was 15th. With all the offense and Shula bashing I can understand why you might think the defense was better than the offense but it was the other way around. TL,DR Wrong we are one of the worse defenses in the league no matter how you look at it.
    • Man, listen. You've already proven on here you're ignorant to a lot of what's going on and get all your talking points from heresay. Earlier in this thread you said Kaepernick hadnt done much, when all you needed to do was a simple google search to find out he's done quite a bit.  Buy you're right in that I think you're a racist person, and I've never accused or called anyone that on this forum. I rarely bring up race. Your first sentence proves to myself and to most who'd open this thread you're indeed racist, and at the very least prejudiced. That's how you would be seen. And my culture? Wtf do you know about my culture man? Of course you and dude can have a civil conversation. You're not attacking him, but you did attack me with your first sentence. I've been on this forum for years, and have seen you're type of talk being spouted in this forum for years without ever saying anything. Finally decided to say something, and I'm going to call it like I see it and call you what I think you are  


    • There really isn't a huge difference between the 62s and 57 but the price point differences are staggering. The 2016 Maybach 57 is actually a great value for executives/corporate travel


      Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle