Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Great Interview with Mike Mitchell on Panthers.com


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • posts: 11,395
  • Reputation: 9,255
  • LocationAsheville, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:26 AM

and it looks like Melvin will be getting more chances, or so Mitchell eluded too.  I know Mitchell has been seen as a head-hunter and penalty inducing safety, rightfully so. I'm hoping this transition to Free Safety will benefit the entire secondary because he has elite speed, is a thumper and seems to be a heady guy (pun intended). He saw the formation the Giants were in and called the trap to Melvin who got the pick. Coming from Oakland he has practiced against Palmer which should be a plus.

 

Here's the interview:

 

http://www.panthers....8a-f433916e22b3



#2 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:33 AM

i still would love to see josh norman play FS and given the freedom to roam about like honey badger.



#3 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • posts: 11,395
  • Reputation: 9,255
  • LocationAsheville, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:36 AM

i still would love to see josh norman play FS and given the freedom to roam about like honey badger.

 

do you think he has the speed for that? also it's telling that mitchell didn't name norman when he listed off the young dbs playing.



#4 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,811
  • Reputation: 2,646
HUDDLER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:41 AM

We are playing a lot of SS in the box, so we need a FS who can cover a lot of ground.  (I am not an expert here, but it simply makes sense).  WHen I look back at the best FS converts from CB, it seems they are all students of the game--smart football players.  I am not sure Norman will ever fit that profile. In addition, Norman is older than people realize-26 or so, if that matters.



#5 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 01 October 2013 - 10:42 AM

do you think he has the speed for that? also it's telling that mitchell didn't name norman when he listed off the young dbs playing.

 

i think he does have the speed and the ball hawking skills.

 

i agree that him not being named is probably a statement on norman, but i think he's more suited for FS than corner so, imo, he's playing out of position and being a bit misused. i just don't think he's cut out for playing corner, esp. in this system. you put him in a situation where he can use his strengths and limits his liability in man coverage and i think you see him play more like he did in preseason.

 

he's a good ball hawk/QB spy. i think he does a good job of reading the QB, seeing where he needs to be, and getting there.
 



#6 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • posts: 11,395
  • Reputation: 9,255
  • LocationAsheville, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 11:12 AM

i think he does have the speed and the ball hawking skills.

 

i agree that him not being named is probably a statement on norman, but i think he's more suited for FS than corner so, imo, he's playing out of position and being a bit misused. i just don't think he's cut out for playing corner, esp. in this system. you put him in a situation where he can use his strengths and limits his liability in man coverage and i think you see him play more like he did in preseason.

 

he's a good ball hawk/QB spy. i think he does a good job of reading the QB, seeing where he needs to be, and getting there.
 

 

i'm not ready to give up on norman yet but his window is definitely closing



#7 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 01 October 2013 - 11:24 AM

i'm not ready to give up on norman yet but his window is definitely closing

 

agreed. he's got a lot of natural talent that i would love to see us take advantage of, but...and this feels really wierd typing this, much less thinking this...i think we're ok in the secondary right now so we don't need to experiment with norman and we don't necessarily need him to be on the field and succeed for us to do well. i mean if we didn't have that front 6/7 and weren't dropping back 7 into coverage i think i might feel differently, but the way things are going we're in pretty good shape with who we have.



#8 2jakefansinva

2jakefansinva

    Coach Jack Bolton

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,983
  • Reputation: 768
HUDDLER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 11:44 AM

what a great interview, hope Mr. Mitchell is here for a long time.........sounds like a good leader.

 

who was saying that our defense doesn't communicate ??

 

seems everyone of them that gets interviewed says the exact opposite.

 

 

I liked the part where he said we did nothing special (scheme wise) on Defense against the Giants.



#9 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • Joined: 28-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 13,637
  • Reputation: 3,571
HUDDLER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 11:51 AM

i still would love to see josh norman play FS and given the freedom to roam about like honey badger.


Freedom to roam? You do know you have to actually know who to cover, right? Norman would be a slower Sherrod Martin out there.

#10 bleys

bleys

    Simple and Plain

  • Joined: 28-November 08
  • posts: 15,597
  • Reputation: 1,635
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 October 2013 - 12:02 PM

assuming he can handle coverage responsibilities at FS long term, I love the thought of him roaming the secondary ready to deliver those big hits...  It's terrifying as a receiver, even more so after the first one connects..




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users