Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Andy Lucky

154 posts in this topic

Posted

You might wanna check the final score and stats.

 

Given that he just handed Seattle their first loss, this might not have been a good day to start an anti-Luck thread.

 

Luck 18/30      193 pass           0 TD    1 INT            66.3 rating

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

did you watch the game? Colts dropped a ton of passes tonight. can't blame luck for that. he played well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

did you watch the game? Colts dropped a ton of passes tonight. can't blame luck for that. he played well.

 

i wouldn't say he played well but indeed the entire colts team poo the bed tonight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There were a few bad drops that hurt the offense. Luck didn't play great, but not awful either. The INT at the end was ugly, but meaningless anyway as the game was out of reach. Fortunately for Andrew Luck he won't get blamed for the loss, like some other QB's.

 

He doesn't comer out wearing Superman football shoes.  Doesn't wear Superman T-shirts under his jersey.  He spends his off season watching game films.  (Not launching his line of GQ men's clothes.) 

 

Stay classy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I am watching the IND v SEA game and I'm sorry but Luck is just not very impressive to me.  Forgetting the fact that he is 5 for 13 at this point, he is just not playing very well. I honestly don't understand the hype. The Peyton comparison is just not there. Lots of QB's call plays at the line. Not just them two but for all the hype he is obviously calling the wrong ones lol.  Maybe he will get better but for all the hype he got over the past 3 years it really just isn't there yet.

 

He has many of bad habits,

 

He doesn't always go through his progressions

 

He tends to roll out of the pocket when he doesn't have to.

 

He doesn't climb the pocket when he should.

 

He stares down receivers.

 

He is accurate but not abnormally

 

He is obviously behind many of the QB's from his generation, not just his year group.

 

 

With all this, I just don't get why people are riding him so hard. Even in college he couldn't out perform his class in either year to win the Heisman when it was basically given to him at the beginning of the season. And in the NFL he is just another young QB. Not saying he is horrible, but definitely not worth the hype. It really wouldn't bother me except I get tired of the announcers always reaching for compliments. Anyways just some observations. If anyone feels any different, point to a game against even a decent defense where he performed well.

 

I think you just described Cam.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Luck 18/30      193 pass           0 TD    1 INT            66.3 rating

 

You really sure you still wanna push this point?

 

Cause if you wanna go the route of trying to say that a game with bad stats shows something, you probably don't wanna take a look at Newton's stats against Arizona.

 

Now, if you wanna defend those stats by pointing to bad O-Line, poor performance by teammates, bad defense and/or dropped passes, all well and good...except then you have no standing to invalidate those points when made about Luck in the Chargers game.

 

So, are you gonna stick with this agenda?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm sure glad that Andrew Luck has all these Panthers fans at his disposal to come to his defense so quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm sure glad that Andrew Luck has all these Panthers fans at his disposal to come to his defense so quickly.

 

Well, it balances the fans who are too insecure to admit Luck might actually be good because they're afraid it somehow hurts Cam.

 

(the whole premise of which is pretty silly)

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well, it balances the fans who are too insecure to admit Luck might actually be good because they're afraid it somehow hurts Cam.

 

(the whole premise of which is pretty silly)

 

 

There are more fans here that know Luck is a legitimate talent at quarterback than not.

 

It's just strange that some people can look past mistakes for Andrew, but if it's Cam, they casually talk about trade possibilities.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There are more fans here that know Luck is a legitimate talent at quarterback than not.

 

It's just strange that some people can look past mistakes for Andrew, but if it's Cam, they casually talk about trade possibilities.

MY FUGGIN POINT!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I am watching the IND v SEA game and I'm sorry but Luck is just not very impressive to me.  Forgetting the fact that he is 5 for 13 at this point, he is just not playing very well. I honestly don't understand the hype. The Peyton comparison is just not there. Lots of QB's call plays at the line. Not just them two but for all the hype he is obviously calling the wrong ones lol.  Maybe he will get better but for all the hype he got over the past 3 years it really just isn't there yet.

 

He has many of bad habits,

 

He doesn't always go through his progressions

 

He tends to roll out of the pocket when he doesn't have to.

 

He doesn't climb the pocket when he should.

 

He stares down receivers.

 

He is accurate but not abnormally

 

He is obviously behind many of the QB's from his generation, not just his year group.

 

 

With all this, I just don't get why people are riding him so hard. Even in college he couldn't out perform his class in either year to win the Heisman when it was basically given to him at the beginning of the season. And in the NFL he is just another young QB. Not saying he is horrible, but definitely not worth the hype. It really wouldn't bother me except I get tired of the announcers always reaching for compliments. Anyways just some observations. If anyone feels any different, point to a game against even a decent defense where he performed well.

 

 

U're seeing what i've have been saying. Luck is no different than the other team managing QBs out there like Dalton. As a matter of fact, IMO Dalton is better.

 

What I've realized with those who make such lofty predictions of these QB is that they cannot be wrong. They will continue selling us the Luck kool-aid unless he implodes like Blaine, another media "chosen QB" who was so "NFL ready," or do a decent enough job to continue painting him into being better than Peyton. Remember on like the endless Heisman Trophy hyped that he never got, the media can control his image in the NFL and even push to get him into the HOF, if he doesn't implode before then.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Well, it balances the fans who are too insecure to admit Luck might actually be good because they're afraid it somehow hurts Cam.

 

(the whole premise of which is pretty silly)

 

 

U're kidding?

 

Not everyone is that Cam-centered. I look at all these QBs individually. My argument is less about Cam and more about the hypocrisy of those who will nit-pick him but over look every ounce of Luck's flaws.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites