Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CharlottePanther

Aaron Rodgers 2012. One of the most sacked QBs.. 108 QB rating and 39 TDs.

Recommended Posts



Cam is a slow decision maker. His pocket mobility is horrible, how many times do you see elite QB's spin in the pocket???, It's like he is doing the hokey pokey. See he starts out doing the right thing as a QB by clap, clap, clapping his hands. Then he gets a little messy, see the elite ones slide to the left, slide to the right, take it back now yall. If that doesn't work they turn it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam certainly deserves his share of the blame in these losses, but I would take Greg Jennings, Randall Cobb, Jordy Nelson, Jermichael Finley, and James Jones over our ramshackle group of receivers. Sometimes Cam holds the ball too long. Sometimes it's because nobody is open anywhere down the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see, Nelson and Cobb with an offensive scheme that makes Rodgers get rid of the ball in under 2 seconds. Gee, that's a fair and knowledgeable comparison.

 

i'm not so sure newton is capable of getting rid of the ball in under 2 seconds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rodgers runs a pass-heavy WCO offense predicated on getting the ball out quick. When that fails he gets sacked.

 

We run a Coryell vertical offense predicated on taking shots downfield and chunk plays. When that fails Cam gets sacked.

 

There, now you're not as dumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

most elite quarterbacks make their receivers look good.

 

it's the reason why they seem to always have a good receiving corp.

 

myth.

 

look at brady pre-moss/welker, with moss/welker and post-moss/welker.

 

reggie wayne, marvin harrison and dallas clark just weren't that good, huh? same with thomas, decker and welker?

 

every qb needs good receivers to put up big numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm not so sure newton is capable of getting rid of the ball in under 2 seconds.

The plays yesterday that took 2 seconds to develop. Screen to Ginn (good gain), Screen to Deangelo (good gain), 3 yard pass to Tolbert (gain of 7 or 8). All these other young QB's are getting these type of play calls on a regular basis. Cam is constantly being asked to make a 20 yard pass. That 3rd down screen to Ginn was the first time Shula put Cam in a good position.

What you really should be thinking is that if Shula consistently capable of calling plays that call for Newton to get rid of the ball in 2 seconds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam is the problem. Time will tell.

 

"cam is the problem" is an absolute statement

 

"time will tell" is a saying that denotes ambiguity, the opposite of an absolute statement

 

please learn basic things about how humans communicate and form linear thought processes before using your keyboard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rodgers runs a pass-heavy WCO offense predicated on getting the ball out quick. When that fails he gets sacked.

 

We run a Coryell vertical offense predicated on taking shots downfield and chunk plays. When that fails Cam gets sacked.

 

There, now you're not as dumb.

 

i tell you it's shocking to me that people who insist that offensive lines and skill position players don't matter at all when it comes to a quarterback's performance seemingly don't know what a west coast offense even is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh look, more asinine comparisons.

 

"I wonder why this third year QB isn't yet as complete as an eight veteran or a thirteen year veteran. He must suck. Trade him."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"cam is the problem" is an absolute statement

 

"time will tell" is a saying that denotes ambiguity, the opposite of an absolute statement

 

please learn basic things about how humans communicate and form linear thought processes before using your keyboard

Chuck was saying that he believed this absolute..time will tell was for you and those who may be on the fence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only people "on the fence" about Cam, are mouth breathers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from rotoworld this morning:

Ryan Tannehill is on pace to be sacked 77 times this season, which would set an NFL record.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tbh i wish the guys who keep making these assumptions were browns or jaguar fans, the media already bashes Cam enough whether he's doing good or not, then we have our own fan base who don't seem to understand the game of football throw out baseless assumptions without evidence..................but of course not all of us are that dumb and blinded

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

myth.

 

look at brady pre-moss/welker, with moss/welker and post-moss/welker.

 

reggie wayne, marvin harrison and dallas clark just weren't that good, huh? same with thomas, decker and welker?

 

every qb needs good receivers to put up big numbers.

 

I don't understand your point...

 

tom brady was a 3x pro bowler, 3x super bowl champion, and already considered a hall of famer before welker or moss put on a patriot uniform.

 

wayne, harrison, and clark were all products of peyton manning.

 

thomas, decker, and welker are better now because of manning.

 

it doesn't matter if they were good beforehand, average, or flat outright bad...an elite qb makes his recievers better. period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



×