Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jackofalltrades

What Ram fans are saying

424 posts in this topic

This weeks humor and disrespect is brought to you by Ramsondemand.com. I joined the site and am trying to engage in friendly talk, but so far I've been informed that we aren't as good as the Rams because of the competition we've played, circumstances, blah, blah, blah.

 

Anyway, so far they're a civil bunch and have a lot in common with us. Our teams are similar and the fan bases seem to be as well.

 

Here are a few blumbs I found interesting.

 

 

Seattle sucks on the road, Spiller has been hobbled by knee and ankle injuries (he left the game week 2 with a knee injury), and Peterson had 60 yards on 10 carries, playing 2 days after his son died + still had 6 YPC with a terrible QB starting QB. That's good but that's not Great either. Peterson is not 'shutdown' if he's averaging 6 yards a carry, that's his team doing it to him...

I'm not going to claim we shut down arian foster - but i will point out they will losing the entire game. You can almost pretty much concede the run when up by 3 scores or more than 2 possessions late in the game.

I still believe our d-line is better - I like your studly 2 DT's, but I don't see any strong pass rushing depth..Not only do we have Quinn AND Long, but we also have Hayes (8 sacks last year as 3rd rotational DE)..

and yea, you guys can definitely be thrown on - 27th against the pass

 

 

 

I don't know that much about the Panthers. Like who their top draft picks are. At least they knew we have Austin.

 

 

 

This is how I'd call it:
QB - Push
HB/FB - Carolina
WR/TE - Push
OL - Push
DL - Push
LB - Carolina
DB - Rams

K/P - Rams
ST - Carolina

 

 

 

 

 

LOL, I know right!  Those people in the "queen city" get a little out of touch from time to time.  Reality check time come Sunday!

 

 

So, if you join please be civil. I don't want to get booted because some of you idiots can maintain an intelligent conversation. However, I do hope to see some others jump in and join the fray.

 

http://www.ramsondemand.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17276

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have Bradford at QB. Let me repeat that. Bradford.

Jackson is now on The Falcons.

Austin has been a disappointment thus far.

Their run defense is almost dead last.

Finnegan is done.

And they wanna talk? Ok...

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't blame them.  31 team's fans look at the schedule during the preseason.  31 teams mark the Panthers as a W when predicting this season's final record.  No one fears us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No pass rush depth?

You even football bro?

 

 

I understand the pass rush remark being that we also have a top 3 DL. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't blame them. 31 team's fans look at the schedule during the preseason. 31 teams mark the Panthers as a W when predicting this season's final record. No one fears us.

People do the same thing with the Rams...

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll say this, The Rams are very capable of laying a smackdown. I like their D-Line and their Mike LBer. Jenkins is awesome too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People do the same thing with the Rams...

 

Yep.  We do it every year.  And every year the Panthers find a way to make us wonder how the fug we just lost to that team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looked at both your posts, they didn't improve so I will pick this one. Cherrypicking a stat or six game period that was decent hardly justifies that we were middle of the pack. First of all this discussion was about cornerbacks not defensive ends so your run defense and sack stats means little. Newsflash. We were top 10 in rush defense because teams didn't have to run on us when they could pick up chunks in passing the ball. We were 26th in number of rushing attempts by the opponent meaning 25 teams had the opponent rush more times than we did.  And we were second in sacks for the same reason. Teams passed all the time on us giving us many more times to sack them.  We had the 6th most passes thrown against us. We were second in sacks behind Arizona- 47   to their 48. But they had 547 attempts against them versus our 612. So we had a sack for every 13 attempts. Arizona had a sack every 11 attempts. Even Buffalo which ranked 9th in sacks with 39 had the same one sack for every 13 passes attempted as we did. Teams completed passes almost 70% of the time which also ranks us 29th. We were tied for 22nd with 4 other teams in giving up 7.5 yards per pass play.  We were 21st in yards surrendered in total defense. And in points surrendered we were 26th not 15th. That was offense not defense that was 15th. With all the offense and Shula bashing I can understand why you might think the defense was better than the offense but it was the other way around. TL,DR Wrong we are one of the worse defenses in the league no matter how you look at it.
    • Man, listen. You've already proven on here you're ignorant to a lot of what's going on and get all your talking points from heresay. Earlier in this thread you said Kaepernick hadnt done much, when all you needed to do was a simple google search to find out he's done quite a bit.  Buy you're right in that I think you're a racist person, and I've never accused or called anyone that on this forum. I rarely bring up race. Your first sentence proves to myself and to most who'd open this thread you're indeed racist, and at the very least prejudiced. That's how you would be seen. And my culture? Wtf do you know about my culture man? Of course you and dude can have a civil conversation. You're not attacking him, but you did attack me with your first sentence. I've been on this forum for years, and have seen you're type of talk being spouted in this forum for years without ever saying anything. Finally decided to say something, and I'm going to call it like I see it and call you what I think you are  


    • There really isn't a huge difference between the 62s and 57 but the price point differences are staggering. The 2016 Maybach 57 is actually a great value for executives/corporate travel


      Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle