Jump to content


Photo
* * * * - 3 votes

What Ram fans are saying


  • Please log in to reply
423 replies to this topic

#31 Chaos

Chaos

    A Star is born

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,558 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:45 AM

Rams are 2-0 without finnegan who if you watched play this year was who every team targeted. As well as our new RB stacy who has also led to us being 2-0 in his 2 starts and Bradford is statistically in the top 10 in QBs this season with only 3 picks and 13 TD's (1 behind brees) a QB rating of 90...

 

 

 

Lets actually compare Newton and Bradford for a minute shall we.....

 

TD's Bradford = 13 Newton = 9

Int     Bradford = 3   Newton = 5

Yards Bradford = 1432  Newton = 1127

Completion %  Bradford = 59.8 Newton = 60.2

QB Rating Bradford = 90.7   Newton = 89.4

Sacked Bradford = 13      Newton = 16

 

 

 

So please o please tell me how Cam has been so much better this year? (less games and less attempts, yet more interceptions and sacks?

 

Wait, so you want to compare the QB's, call out Cam for having a higher INT and sack count for playing one less game?  How about Bradford's higher yardage and TD totals?  It swings both ways genius, you can't skew the numbers only to favor your argument.  Then again, I guess you can.  Do the TD's include the rushing TD's or only passing TD's?

 

Putting all your percentages aside, if you were to poll the Rams fanbase on who they would rather have as QB - Cam or Sam, I think we all know what the overwhelming choice would be. 



#32 pantherclaw

pantherclaw

    Wise Ass

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,402 posts
  • LocationGalveston

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:45 AM

The Rams are underrated, and just as inconsistent as the Panthers are.

This is still a game the Panthers should win.

#33 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,593 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:46 AM

also, half of peterson's yards came on one play where we had our 5th string DT in because we were stomping them so badly... so on 9 carries he had roughly 30 yards against our 1's. our run D is pretty sick nasty this year. 



#34 BigRamFan

BigRamFan

    NOT NEWB

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • LocationFlorida Keys

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:46 AM

Never use that website.....if you want a good and honst rams forum use Clanram........the others are jokes

 

I respectfully disagree.  Clanram is a good site but ramsondemand is full of knowledgeable football fans.  Admittedly, most of us know more about the Rams than other teams but the knowledge base there is good and so are the guys who hang out there.



#35 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,593 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:47 AM

You are proving my point lol....I was stating that it is a push but others were laughing it off as it was not close. I would agree it has been a push thus far this year. 

 

it was more of a thinking out loud and reaching the same conclusion with all the data at hand kind of deal. 



#36 StoneColdTavonAustin

StoneColdTavonAustin

    NOT NEWB

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 43 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:48 AM

Wait, so you want to compare the QB's, call out Cam for having a higher INT and sack count for playing one less game?  How about Bradford's higher yardage and TD totals?  It swings both ways genius, you can't skew the numbers only to favor your argument.  Then again, I guess you can.  Do the TD's include the rushing TD's or only passing TD's?

 

Putting all your percentages aside, if you were to poll the Rams fanbase on who they would rather have as QB - Cam or Sam, I think we all know what the overwhelming choice would be. 

 

 

I was addressing it is a push that was the purpose of the stats..



#37 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,837 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:48 AM

their defense matches up well against our O, but our def also matches up well against theirs.  yea, so defensive game here



#38 BigRamFan

BigRamFan

    NOT NEWB

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • LocationFlorida Keys

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:48 AM

lol Sam Bradford

 

Seriously?  13 TDs - 3 INTs on the season and the team in 6th in the league in red zone efficiency.



#39 Jackofalltrades

Jackofalltrades

    OWN the Line of Scrimmage

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,405 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:49 AM

Given the inconsistency by both QB's I think a push is favor.

 

Cam's ceiling is far higher than Sam's, but that doesn't mean much at this point.



#40 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,593 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:49 AM

Wait, so you want to compare the QB's, call out Cam for having a higher INT and sack count for playing one less game?  How about Bradford's higher yardage and TD totals?  It swings both ways genius, you can't skew the numbers only to favor your argument.  Then again, I guess you can.  Do the TD's include the rushing TD's or only passing TD's?

 

Putting all your percentages aside, if you were to poll the Rams fanbase on who they would rather have as QB - Cam or Sam, I think we all know what the overwhelming choice would be. 

 

I covered that on page two, they are having roughly the same year at this point with averages and what not. his original argument had false facts, however his conclusion seems to check out.

 

he basically proved 2+2 is 5 but forgot to mention the extra +1 involved. 



#41 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,593 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:51 AM

also, guise, be nice to the rams fans, I've never actually even SEEN one of these.

 

They're like an endangered species, I don't want to scare them away in all their majestic glory. 



#42 CarolinaPanthers8789

CarolinaPanthers8789

    Alexander SEMIN!!! FTW

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,448 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina/Virginia

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:51 AM

The Rams go how Bradford goes, if we don't get a lot of pressure on Bradford (ala Carson Palmer/Arizona) then they could be dangerous. However, their running game will most likely be non-existstant as the Panthera still haven't allowed a 100 yard rusher in quite some time.

On defense, I think the Panthers can take advantage of that Jeff Fisher (over-pursuing defense) by using a lot of bubble and smoke screens to Ted Ginn and Steve Smith while also using Williams in the passing game quite a bit on check downs. I also think that the play action pass could really be a big factor in the game (if the Panthers choose to use it frequently).

If we execute... we will win by a 14+, but if Shula abandons the run (taking away the play action) and only uses pass plays where the routes take longer than three seconds to develop, then we could easily lose by 14+ because St. Louis's front line isn't to be underestimated.

#43 BigRamFan

BigRamFan

    NOT NEWB

  • NEWB
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • LocationFlorida Keys

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:52 AM

This is the Rams numbers against the Texans.

Total First Downs
Rams 15 Texans 27

Total Plays
Rams 41 Texans 73

Total Yards
Rams 216 Texans 420

Total Time of Poss.
Rams 24:50 Texans 35:10

Total Turnovers
Rams 0 Texans 4

When looking at our blow out against the Vikings against their blow out agaist thg Texans, its clear their is a stark difference in our favor. Rams got blown out 31-7 against the Falcons and the Falcons D is horrid

 

Someone doesn't read well.  The score in the Rams Falcons game was 31 - 24.



#44 Coug Girl

Coug Girl

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 798 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:53 AM

Cam is more explosive player but that comes with downsides of turnovers and ball security problems. Of course having Bell in there on the right makes rolling out to the right nearly a death wish for Cam.

#45 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,881 posts

Posted 15 October 2013 - 11:56 AM

Can't overlook the Rams. This team seems yo have a tendency to get complacent against these type of sneaky good teams.

By sneaky good I mean teams that may not be elite or playoff teams, but not as bad as most people think they are (i.e. Zona, Buff)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.