Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

top dawg

Schefter: Nicks trade has NOT been discussed, but should be (for a conditional 4th, possible 3rd)

51 posts in this topic

Oh wow a proven WR for a 4th round pick? Tell me again how many successful players we've gotten in the fourth round? G-man needs to get on this. Cut Donald's drop happy ass.

Issue would not be the 4th rd pick....it would be the huge contract he would want at the end if this season.

Would have to work out the deal for an acceptable contract before making the trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Questions about Nicks:

 

 

How many years left does he have in his prime? Im curious because I dont know what kind of a player he really is. Does he take a lot of damage? Is he gonna play past 30 effectively?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been a straight up trade for Beaston with an additional 4-6 round conditional pick, depending upon his impending signing. Oh the fug well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been a straight up trade for Beaston with an additional 4-6 round conditional pick, depending upon his impending signing. Oh the fug well.

 

I agree. Beason has led their team in tackles the last 2 weeks. So definitely would've benefitted both sides.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let LaFell go? Lolwat? Drop Hixons bum ass and let Smitty, Ginn, Nicks, LaFell, X player be our WR core.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My only thought on Nixon is he's gettlemans nick hayden, useless player but gm loves him. Personally I liked Hayden more, guy was not nfl caliber but he played hard. Well I remember him playing hard but I might be crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hayden has been playing decently for the Cowboys. I'd rather have him than Fua.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which receiver would you take off the field? Ginn or Lafell?

Simple solution. Go 4 wide a lot more. Plain and simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much rather invest in a better oline for Cam. A line that can punch holes and hold at the point of attack is what would push this offense over the top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites