Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Schefter: Nicks trade has NOT been discussed, but should be (for a conditional 4th, possible 3rd)


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#31 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,920
  • Reputation: 5,441
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:11 PM

Oh wow a proven WR for a 4th round pick? Tell me again how many successful players we've gotten in the fourth round? G-man needs to get on this. Cut Donald's drop happy ass.


Issue would not be the 4th rd pick....it would be the huge contract he would want at the end if this season.

Would have to work out the deal for an acceptable contract before making the trade.

#32 Razeyfingers

Razeyfingers

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,665
  • Reputation: 807
HUDDLER

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:20 PM

Questions about Nicks:

 

 

How many years left does he have in his prime? Im curious because I dont know what kind of a player he really is. Does he take a lot of damage? Is he gonna play past 30 effectively?

 

 



#33 Corporal Casto

Corporal Casto

    Noob Member

  • Joined: 12-December 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 538
  • Reputation: 160
  • LocationQueen City
HUDDLER

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:22 PM

Should have been a straight up trade for Beaston with an additional 4-6 round conditional pick, depending upon his impending signing. Oh the fug well.



#34 Nate Dogg

Nate Dogg

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 21-October 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 414
  • Reputation: 315
  • LocationYadkinville
HUDDLER

Posted 26 October 2013 - 04:18 PM

Should have been a straight up trade for Beaston with an additional 4-6 round conditional pick, depending upon his impending signing. Oh the fug well.

 

I agree. Beason has led their team in tackles the last 2 weeks. So definitely would've benefitted both sides.



#35 Ivan The Awesome

Ivan The Awesome

    Keep Pounding...all the way to...the draft! :D

  • Joined: 11-May 11
  • posts: 10,045
  • Reputation: 2,742
  • LocationNC
SUPPORTER

Posted 27 October 2013 - 02:59 AM

Let LaFell go? Lolwat? Drop Hixons bum ass and let Smitty, Ginn, Nicks, LaFell, X player be our WR core.

#36 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,640
  • Reputation: 3,222
HUDDLER

Posted 27 October 2013 - 03:25 AM

Seriously. No clue why Hixon is still on this roster.

#37 Manos

Manos

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 08-January 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 458
  • Reputation: 90
HUDDLER

Posted 27 October 2013 - 03:29 AM

My only thought on Nixon is he's gettlemans nick hayden, useless player but gm loves him. Personally I liked Hayden more, guy was not nfl caliber but he played hard. Well I remember him playing hard but I might be crazy.

#38 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,640
  • Reputation: 3,222
HUDDLER

Posted 27 October 2013 - 03:50 AM

Hayden has been playing decently for the Cowboys. I'd rather have him than Fua.

#39 Pantherman

Pantherman

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,162
  • Reputation: 278
HUDDLER

Posted 27 October 2013 - 06:51 AM

Which receiver would you take off the field? Ginn or Lafell?

Simple solution. Go 4 wide a lot more. Plain and simple.



#40 Snake

Snake

    Rivera did What???

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,641
  • Reputation: 1,231
HUDDLER

Posted 27 October 2013 - 06:56 AM

Much rather invest in a better oline for Cam. A line that can punch holes and hold at the point of attack is what would push this offense over the top.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users