Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Starter launches new jackets. Doesn't include the panthers

53 posts in this topic

Posted

149 for a starter jacket in 2013 hahahahahahah

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It's okay. Starter has proven they shouldn't be confused for savvy business decisions.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Starter who?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Remember when Starter used to actually be a name?  Now they're basically the Wal-Mart brand.

 

I had a jacket like that for my elementary school back in the '80s.  Nobody is gonna buy that poo.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Dallas doesn't have one either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Some marketing/demographics guy spent days figuring out where to sell and how much to charge.

 

The fact that we aren't included is a compliment.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Dallas doesn't have one either.

 

I wonder if it has to do with naming/logo rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

damn, those are boogity!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

All clothing designs have to be approved by the team. For all we know the Panthers denied them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

1992 called and wants its jackets back.  Maybe that's why there aren't any Carolina ones, the team didn't even exist when starters were cool.

 

I had an Oakland, a Chicago Bulls and a Buffalo one. They are probably still in a box somewhere.

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I had a panthers starter pullover in 96...I liked it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites