Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

MNF: Seahawks at Rams


  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#81 Mother Grabber

Mother Grabber

    Gettlemagic 2.0

  • Joined: 22-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,501
  • Reputation: 3,455
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:13 PM

seattles offense has consisted of 1 play tonight. outside of that 80yd pass, they haven't done poo.

#82 RelaxImaPro

RelaxImaPro

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 16-April 12
  • posts: 3,086
  • Reputation: 3,159
  • LocationThe Moon
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:14 PM

I've heard some Seahawks fans say that Smitty was Tate's favorite receiver... lol I think that taunt was him having 89's back.



#83 Mother Grabber

Mother Grabber

    Gettlemagic 2.0

  • Joined: 22-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,501
  • Reputation: 3,455
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:16 PM

Honestly, this type of performance really makes our defense appear superior. We held Stacy to 56 yards on a 3.1 average. The Hawks' D surrendered 100 yards on 19 carries before half-time.


both our offense and defense. we put up 30 on the rams, and Seattle barely has 30yds outside of one big play.

#84 Mother Grabber

Mother Grabber

    Gettlemagic 2.0

  • Joined: 22-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,501
  • Reputation: 3,455
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:23 PM

holy crap, Wilson's hands are huge!

#85 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 13
  • posts: 8,160
  • Reputation: 3,336
  • LocationSouth Florida
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:24 PM

How did we let this team beat us?!


Well, to be fair, St. Louis has a more physical secondary than ours. It's a trade-off though. Their run defense sucks, so the Rams have to load the box. If the secondary doesn't hold up, they'll get shredded by Wilson because their safeties aren't providing proper over the top help for the corners.

With us, we can afford to drop seven into coverage and only rush four. That said, we give opposing wideouts too much cushion because of our zone scheme. Yet, we're not allowing the "big play" to happen.

#86 TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam

    Cam Nut Hugger

  • Joined: 27-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,637
  • Reputation: 953
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:25 PM

this has been a damn good game. well done rams



#87 Promethean Forerunner

Promethean Forerunner

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 15-February 13
  • posts: 8,160
  • Reputation: 3,336
  • LocationSouth Florida
SUPPORTER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:26 PM

I've heard some Seahawks fans say that Smitty was Tate's favorite receiver... lol I think that taunt was him having 89's back.


I heard that too. Tate is supposedly a big 89 fan. It wouldn't shock me if Golden was taunting Jenkins because of last week.

#88 PantherWake

PantherWake

    How Bout Dem Gamecocks

  • Joined: 30-June 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,125
  • Reputation: 1,820
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:29 PM

Oh snap Seahawks about to lose



#89 Silent Majority

Silent Majority

    Fuggin' Panther Fan

  • Joined: 03-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,088
  • Reputation: 591
  • LocationPrinceton, freaking, New Jersey.
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:31 PM

Seattle looking mighty average tonight.

#90 PantherWake

PantherWake

    How Bout Dem Gamecocks

  • Joined: 30-June 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,125
  • Reputation: 1,820
HUDDLER

Posted 28 October 2013 - 10:31 PM

Well, to be fair, St. Louis has a more physical secondary than ours. It's a trade-off though. Their run defense sucks, so the Rams have to load the box. If the secondary doesn't hold up, they'll get shredded by Wilson because their safeties aren't providing proper over the top help for the corners.

With us, we can afford to drop seven into coverage and only rush four. That said, we give opposing wideouts too much cushion because of our zone scheme. Yet, we're not allowing the "big play" to happen.

 

Yeah we definitely need draft a CB in the first or second round next year so we can stack the box every now and then.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users